How can partial fractions be used to solve inverse Laplace transforms?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using partial fractions to solve an inverse Laplace transform problem involving the expression (2s² + 3)/(s² + 3s - 4)². The user factored the denominator and attempted to express it in partial fractions, leading to a partial fraction expansion with coefficients A and B. However, there is uncertainty about the correct approach to expanding the terms, particularly with double roots in the denominator. Participants emphasize the importance of revisiting notes on partial fraction expansion to ensure all necessary terms are included. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on handling double roots in such expansions.
Mark Brewer
Messages
38
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


L-1{(2s2+3)/(s2+3s-4)2}

The Attempt at a Solution


I factored the denominator

f(t)=(2s2+3)/((s-1)(s+4))2

now I've tried partial fractions to get

(2s2+3)/((s-1)(s+4))2 = A/(s-1)2 + B(s+4)2

(2s2+3)=A(s+4)2 + B(s-1)2

by substitution, s=1 and s=-4

5=A(25)
A=1/5

35=B(25)
B=7/5

(1/5) 1/(s-1)2 + (7/5) 1/(s+4)2

At this point I'm not sure if I am on the right track, but I did start to see some identities that may help.

1/5 L-1{1/(s-1)2} +7/5 L-1{1/(s+4)2}

I'm starting to see a pattern for n!\sn+1 and eat

Am I on the right track, or did I go on a tangent?

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to take another look at your partial fraction expansion. How do you expand when you have double roots in the denominator?
 
I'm not sure if splitting the roots, or can I?
 
sorry, I'm not sure if I can split the roots to two rationals.
 
Note, when I say "double roots", I mean, how do you expand into separate terms when, for instance, one of the zeroes of the denominator is squared (or cubed, etc.)?
 
A polynomial would then be formed, right?
 
Mark Brewer said:
A polynomial would then be formed, right?
You may want to look back at your old notes regarding how to expand it using partial fractions. You're missing a couple of terms in your expansion.
 
Okay. Thank you, I'll reply as soon as I see my mistakes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K