How can partial fractions be used to solve inverse Laplace transforms?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using partial fractions to solve the inverse Laplace transform of the function L-1{(2s²+3)/(s²+3s-4)²}. The denominator was factored into (s-1)²(s+4)², leading to the partial fraction decomposition A/(s-1)² + B/(s+4)². The values A=1/5 and B=7/5 were determined through substitution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly handling double roots in the denominator and suggests reviewing previous notes on partial fraction expansion for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inverse Laplace transforms
  • Familiarity with partial fraction decomposition
  • Knowledge of polynomial factorization
  • Experience with algebraic substitution techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the method for partial fraction decomposition with double roots
  • Study the properties of inverse Laplace transforms
  • Practice solving similar inverse Laplace transform problems
  • Explore polynomial long division techniques for complex fractions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying differential equations, mathematicians focusing on Laplace transforms, and educators teaching advanced calculus concepts.

Mark Brewer
Messages
38
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


L-1{(2s2+3)/(s2+3s-4)2}

The Attempt at a Solution


I factored the denominator

f(t)=(2s2+3)/((s-1)(s+4))2

now I've tried partial fractions to get

(2s2+3)/((s-1)(s+4))2 = A/(s-1)2 + B(s+4)2

(2s2+3)=A(s+4)2 + B(s-1)2

by substitution, s=1 and s=-4

5=A(25)
A=1/5

35=B(25)
B=7/5

(1/5) 1/(s-1)2 + (7/5) 1/(s+4)2

At this point I'm not sure if I am on the right track, but I did start to see some identities that may help.

1/5 L-1{1/(s-1)2} +7/5 L-1{1/(s+4)2}

I'm starting to see a pattern for n!\sn+1 and eat

Am I on the right track, or did I go on a tangent?

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to take another look at your partial fraction expansion. How do you expand when you have double roots in the denominator?
 
I'm not sure if splitting the roots, or can I?
 
sorry, I'm not sure if I can split the roots to two rationals.
 
Note, when I say "double roots", I mean, how do you expand into separate terms when, for instance, one of the zeroes of the denominator is squared (or cubed, etc.)?
 
A polynomial would then be formed, right?
 
Mark Brewer said:
A polynomial would then be formed, right?
You may want to look back at your old notes regarding how to expand it using partial fractions. You're missing a couple of terms in your expansion.
 
Okay. Thank you, I'll reply as soon as I see my mistakes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K