nst.john
- 163
- 1
I know a lot of the technology (if not all) draws back to physics but what can physicists do to solve world problems and issues?
The discussion explores the role of physicists in addressing global challenges, such as disease and climate change, and the broader implications of physics on society and technology. Participants consider both the positive contributions and potential negative consequences of physics in various contexts.
The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the role of physicists in society, the implications of their work, and whether they should engage in politics. There is no consensus on these issues, and participants express a range of opinions on the benefits and drawbacks of physics.
Participants reference historical examples and hypothetical scenarios to illustrate their points, but these discussions are not resolved and depend on individual interpretations of the impact of physics.
This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring the intersection of science and society, particularly those concerned with the ethical implications of scientific advancements and the role of physicists in addressing global challenges.
arabianights said:it gives us atomic bombs and mountains of industrial waste
lisab said:And a place to gripe about them (internet).
MathematicalPhysicist said:They can stop doing physics, that will save more lives than keep doing physics. :-D
What if we stopped doing physics 500 ears ago?Our lives would be miserable.Try to imagine,Someone from another universe whose technology is so great came to our world and started showing off.How jealous would we be.We would be living in caves if we had stopped doing physics.MathematicalPhysicist said:They can stop doing physics, that will save more lives than keep doing physics. :-D
Chronos said:Err, no they shouldn't. Politicizing science is an awful idea. Can you imagine the acrimony in a string party vs loop party campaign?
Chronos said:Err, no they shouldn't. Politicizing science is an awful idea. Can you imagine the acrimony in a string party vs loop party campaign?
ZapperZ said:That is not as nasty as the Emergent Party versus the Reductionism Party! The Reductionism Party still hasn't forgiven the Emergent Party for helping to kill the SSC!
nst.john said:We can't stop doing physics, it's against our biological makeup to. As humans we're always going to question and experiment whether you like it or not.
ZombieFeynman said:Can you explain why you'd think such a thing?
adjacent said:What if we stopped doing physics 500 ears ago?Our lives would be miserable.Try to imagine,Someone from another universe whose technology is so great came to our world and started showing off.How jealous would we be.We would be living in caves if we had stopped doing physics.
![]()
You are right but people back then might have thought that they were full of technologies(Eg :fire)that would eventually destroy them but fire is a necessary evil.Likewise,Nuclear technology is also a necessary evil.Think about advantages of nuclear power stationsMathematicalPhysicist said:You compare your life today with back then, but I don't think that people back then were any more miserable than people today. You just get accustomed to whatever technology you have.
adjacent said:You are right but people back then might have thought that they were full of technologies(Eg :fire)that would eventually destroy them but fire is a necessary evil.Likewise,Nuclear technology is also a necessary evil.Think about advantages of nuclear power stations
Chronos said:Err, no they shouldn't. Politicizing science is an awful idea. Can you imagine the acrimony in a string party vs loop party campaign?
Choppy said:Ignorance leads to superstition, which in turn leads to oppression.
Physics, at its core, illuminates our understanding of the world around us.
Learning is how we grow.