How can quantum tunneling create Big Bang after heat death?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept that quantum tunneling may lead to a new Big Bang following the heat death of the universe. Participants highlight that while the second law of thermodynamics suggests entropy increases, quantum fluctuations can result in localized reductions of entropy, potentially creating conditions for a new universe. Key points include the notion that the initial seed for this event could be smaller than a proton, and that general relativity's treatment of energy is ambiguous, complicating the understanding of such phenomena. The conversation also suggests that studying cosmic inflation is essential for grasping these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum fluctuations and tunneling
  • Familiarity with the second law of thermodynamics
  • Basic knowledge of general relativity and its implications on energy
  • Concept of cosmic inflation in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research quantum tunneling and its implications in cosmology
  • Study the principles of cosmic inflation and its role in the universe's expansion
  • Explore the relationship between entropy and the second law of thermodynamics
  • Investigate the mathematical frameworks of general relativity regarding energy definitions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the theoretical underpinnings of the universe's origins and the implications of quantum mechanics on cosmological events.

goat-on-a-stick
Messages
6
Reaction score
6
Wikipedia states that, after he heat death of the universe: "Random quantum fluctuations or quantum tunneling can produce another Big Bang in
d4700e90b19b9ae1e3f0c49077041a08.png
years."

How would this work?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Miguel Malfabon
Space news on Phys.org
The second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy always increases, isn't an absolute. The true statement, rather, is that entropy usually increases. Reductions in entropy do occur, but with lower probability. A quantum fluctuation or tunneling event that started a new Big Bang would be just such a reduction of entropy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Miguel Malfabon, goat-on-a-stick, Justice Hunter and 1 other person
I do not understand, with atoms and particles so far apart, how could they possibly accumulate into enough mass to create a big bang?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Miguel Malfabon
goat-on-a-stick said:
I do not understand, with atoms and particles so far apart, how could they possibly accumulate into enough mass to create a big bang?
The initial seed would be smaller than a proton. You don't need much of any mass (neither mass nor energy are conserved in an expanding universe).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Miguel Malfabon and goat-on-a-stick
Less than a proton! This is totally above my head. Thank you for your help. Do you recommend any webpages or reading materials to help me further understand this theory?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Miguel Malfabon
goat-on-a-stick said:
Less than a proton! This is totally above my head. Thank you for your help. Do you recommend any webpages or reading materials to help me further understand this theory?
I saw a discussion about the origin of the universe on Youtube once, I think it was an Issac Asimov debate, but not sure. From it, my understanding is that tiny pockets of empty space can just form out of the laws of quantum physics, and that the mathematics of general relativity say that completely empty space has an outward pressure and will expand rapidly. Rapidly expanding space is thought to create intense Hawking radiation which fills it with energy.

Chalnoth said:
The initial seed would be smaller than a proton. You don't need much of any mass (neither mass nor energy are conserved in an expanding universe).
I thought that the seed would have exactly zero energy?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Miguel Malfabon and goat-on-a-stick
newjerseyrunner said:
I thought that the seed would have exactly zero energy?
That's not entirely clear. Maybe. It depends a bit upon how you define energy (General Relativity doesn't have an unambiguous definition for total energy, and in a lot of situations it's not even possible to come up with a definition of total energy).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Miguel Malfabon, goat-on-a-stick and newjerseyrunner
Why is heat death significant? I thought that according to the math, this sort of thing is happening everywhere all the time?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Miguel Malfabon

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K