How can the force of impact be reduced in an egg toss game?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on reducing the force of impact in an egg toss game using the formula F = Δp / Δt. Participants agree that increasing the time of contact (Δt) will decrease the average force (F), thereby minimizing the risk of breaking the egg. Suggestions include standing closer to each other to reduce throwing speed and employing techniques to extend the braking time during the catch. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding momentum and impulse in achieving these goals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum and impulse concepts
  • Familiarity with the formula F = Δp / Δt
  • Basic knowledge of projectile motion
  • Experience with practical physics experiments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques to increase time of contact in impact scenarios
  • Explore the effects of varying distances on projectile motion
  • Study the physics of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Investigate practical applications of momentum conservation in sports
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in practical applications of physics principles in sports and experiments involving momentum and impact forces.

Thib
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
So I am trying to answer a question which is about an egg toss game where two people try to throw an egg at each other without breaking it.The question is how can the force of impact be reduced?
Relevant Equations
F = Δp / Δt
So I am trying to answer a question which is about an egg toss game where two people try to throw an egg at each other without breaking it.The question is how can the force of impact be reduced so that the egg doesn't break. With respect to the F = Δ p / Δ t formula, I think increasing time of contact will mean less force. Is that correct?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thib said:
Homework Statement: So I am trying to answer a question which is about an egg toss game where two people try to throw an egg at each other without breaking it.The question is how can the force of impact be reduced?
Homework Equations: F = Δp / Δt

So I am trying to answer a question which is about an egg toss game where two people try to throw an egg at each other without breaking it.The question is how can the force of impact be reduced so that the egg doesn't break. With respect to the F = Δ p / Δ t formula, I think increasing time of contact will mean less force. Is that correct?
Thank you
Are you looking for practical suggestions?
 
By the way;
:welcome:
 
PeroK said:
Are you looking for practical suggestions?
I am wondering how I can reduce force of impact
 
PeroK said:
By the way;
:welcome:
Thanks
 
Thib said:
I am wondering how I can reduce force of impact
Yes, I understand that. It depends on the parameters. For example:

My first suggestion is that the two people stand close to each other so they don't have to throw the egg very fast!

Is that the sort of thing you are looking for?

Or, is the distance between the throwers fixed in this game?
 
PeroK said:
Yes, I understand that. It depends on the parameters. For example:

My first suggestion is that the two people stand close to each other so they don't have to throw the egg very fast!

Is that the sort of thing you are looking for?

Or, is the distance between the throwers fixed in this game?
I believe the assumption is that we can neglect the distance. Specifically, the question is asking to use understanding of momentum and impulse to suggest a way to avoid breaking the egg when catching it
 
Thib said:
I believe the assumption is that we can neglect the distance. Specifically, the question is asking to use understanding of momentum and impulse to suggest a way to avoid breaking the egg when catching it
Okay, I've made one suggestion, now it's your turn.

Btw my suggestion was based on an understanding of momentum and impulse - and the parabolic motion of projectiles. Which gives me another idea ...
 
Thib said:
increasing time of contact will mean less force
Yes, that will certainly reduce the average force. Can you refine that a bit?
What would be the best trajectory?
 
  • #10
When I was in grad school, decades ago, we had a egg tossing contest among grad departments. The winning team was the one that tossed the egg the farthest without breaking it. Needless to say, the physics team won hands down by more than 30 ft. from second place. The trick is to catch the ball high above your head and brake its fall by following through along its trajectory, stopping it around your feet. This increases the braking time interval Δt which reduces the time-averaged braking force. I participated only as a spectator, but my roommate was the receiver and I know that he and the tosser practiced with a tennis ball before the contest.
 
  • #11
kuruman said:
reduces the time-averaged braking force
True, but as I hinted, the average force is not the critical aspect.
 
  • #12
kuruman said:
... he and the tosser practiced with a tennis ball before the contest.
To maximize results - at the expense of cleanliness - one wonders why they didn't practice with ... eggs.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
True, but as I hinted, the average force is not the critical aspect.
Yes, but if Δp (assumed fixed) is spread over a longer time interval would that not mean that the instantaneous force dp/dt will be reduced (hopefully) below the breaking force for any time within the interval? Doesn't reducing the time-averaged force imply reducing the instantaneous force at all times during contact?
 
  • #14
DaveC426913 said:
To maximize results - at the expense of cleanliness - one wonders why they didn't practice with ... eggs.
It's not about cleanliness. Graduate students would rather eat eggs than use them for practice. :oldsmile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
  • #15
kuruman said:
Yes, but if Δp (assumed fixed) is spread over a longer time interval would that not mean that the instantaneous force dp/dt will be reduced (hopefully) below the breaking force for any time within the interval? Doesn't reducing the time-averaged force imply reducing the instantaneous force at all times during contact?
I don't see how that follows.

1N over 99ms followed by 99N over 1ms is an average of a mere 1.0N per ms.
But 99N - even for only 1ms - will still break the egg.

(I am terrible at force math, and I think I may have neglected a piece of your scenario. See caveat in sig line *.)
 
  • #16
DaveC426913 said:
1N over 99ms followed by 99N over 1ms is an average of a mere 1.0N per ms.
The average would be 1.98N. (Not N/ms, which is not a dimension I've ever come across.)
 
  • #17
DaveC426913 said:
I don't see how that follows.

1N over 99ms followed by 99N over 1ms is an average of a mere 1.0N per ms.
But 99N - even for only 1ms - will still break the egg.

(I am terrible at force math, and I think I may have neglected a piece of your scenario. See caveat in sig line *.)
The figure shows schematically what I mean. Collision forces in nature usually start from zero, reach a maximum and then go back to zero. Your example is that of a force that is constant for most o the duration then spikes to a large value. If you spread out the collision duration, you bring down the peak force. If the peak force is below the threshold breaking force of the shell, the egg does not break.
Collisionforce.png
 
  • #18
kuruman said:
The figure shows schematically what I mean. Collision forces in nature usually start from zero, reach a maximum and then go back to zero. Your example is that of a force that is constant for most o the duration then spikes to a large value. If you spread out the collision duration, you bring down the peak force. If the peak force is below the threshold breaking force of the shell, the egg does not break.
View attachment 252241
Yes, you are assuming the same overall shape stretched over a longer period. But one can do even better by changing the profile to a rectangle (over the same period).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
19K
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K