MHB How can the lower rectangle method for area approximation be improved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsyed5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Rectangle
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on improving the lower rectangle method for area approximation, highlighting that increasing the number of rectangles enhances accuracy. Alternatives such as the midpoint rule, trapezoidal rule, and Simpson's rule are suggested for better results. It is noted that performing the definite integral provides an exact answer, which is preferable. Additionally, using both left and right hand estimates and averaging them can yield a more accurate approximation. Simpson's rule is identified as the most accurate among basic methods for the same effort.
rsyed5
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Can someone suggest a way to improve the lower rectangle method for area approximation...? I know one way is to increase the number of rectangles so if I put 100 instead of 5 rectangles i will get a better approximation. Another way it could be improved...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is the midpoint rule, the trapezoidal rule, Simpson's rule, and higher order Newton-Cotes formulas. If you are in a calculus course, all of these will be introduced to you soon, except perhaps for the Newton-Cotes formulas.
 
As Mark has suggested, the best way to improve on the Left Hand Estimate is to not use it, but to use a more accurate method. Better yet perform the definite integral to get an exact answer. If worse comes to worse, do a Right Hand Estimate as well and average the results.
 
In the case that a function is increasing (of decreasing) a "left hand" approximation is the same as your "lower rectangle" approximation and a "right hand" approximation is the same as an "upper rectangle" approximation. The average of the two, as Prove It suggests, is the same as the "trapezoid" method. I believe that "Simpson's rule" is the most accurate of the elementary methods for the same amount of work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K