How can the normalization of a wave function be achieved?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of a quantum mechanical wave function for a particle of mass m in one dimension. The original poster presents a wave function involving constants α and A, and seeks to find a value of A that satisfies the normalization condition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct interpretation of the wave function and the modulus squared operation. There are attempts to clarify the implications of complex numbers in the normalization process, with some participants questioning the validity of certain steps taken in the calculations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the normalization process. There is a mix of agreement and questioning about the steps involved, particularly concerning the treatment of complex conjugates and the implications for the integral calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential issues with the dimensions in the original expression and the assumptions regarding the constants involved. There is also uncertainty about the implications of multiplying by the complex conjugate in the context of the normalization integral.

Numnum
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A quantum mechanical wavefunction for a particle of mass m moving in one dimension where α and A are constants.

Normalize the function - that is find a value of A for which \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}|ψ|^2dx=1

Homework Equations



ψ(x,t)= |Ae^{-α(x^2 + it\hbar/m)}|^2

A useful integral: \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}e^{-z^2}dz = √\pi

The Attempt at a Solution



ψ(x,t)= |Ae^{-α(x^2 + it\hbar/m)}|^2

1= \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}|Ae^{-α(x^2 + it\hbar/m)}|^2

1= |A|^2\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}(e^{-α(x^2 + it\hbar/m)})(e^{α(x^2 + it\hbar/m)})

I'm pretty sure the last line is incorrect. My reasoning was that since i is a complex number, for all complex numbers |z|^2≠|z^2z|. Before this, I tried changing the variable by letting z=√(2α(x^2 + it\hbar/m))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right, the last line is incorrect, since you do the following:

|z|^2 = z^2

This is incorrect for complex numbers.

What you have here is basically something of the form

|e^{x^2 + it}| = |e^{x^2}| |e^{it}|

Can you simplify this further?
 
First of all, one should clarify what's the wave function. I guess it's the expression without the modulus squared, i.e., a Gaussian wave packet
\psi(x,t)=A \exp \left [-\alpha \left (x^2+ \mathrm{i} \beta t \right ) \right ].
Note that there is something fishy with the dimensions in the original expression. That's why I've introduced another real constant \beta. I also guess \alpha>0.

Then just take the modulus squared using micromass's suggestion.
 
|e^{-αx^2}||e^{-iαt\hbar/m}|

Take the complex conjugate.

|e^{-αx^2}||e^{-iαt\hbar/m}||e^{iαt\hbar/m}|

And I'm left with this.

e^{-αx^2}

Then,

1= |A|^2\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}e^{-αx^2}dx

1= |A|^2√(\pi/α)

A= a^{1/4}/\pi^{1/4}

Did I get there?
 
Numnum said:
|e^{-αx^2}||e^{-iαt\hbar/m}|

Take the complex conjugate.

|e^{-αx^2}||e^{-iαt\hbar/m}||e^{iαt\hbar/m}|

Not sure what you did here? Did you just multiply by

|e^{i\alpha t \hbar/m}|

Why can you do this?

Aside, from this, all the rest (and the final answer) is ok.

And I'm left with this.

e^{-αx^2}

Then,

1= |A|^2\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}e^{-αx^2}dx

1= |A|^2√(\pi/α)

A= a^{1/4}/\pi^{1/4}

Did I get there?
 
I'm not sure what you're asking. I multiplied by |e^{i\alpha t \hbar/m}| because to normalize a wave function I have to multiply by its complex conjugate and get e^0.

For the final answer, did I forget to square the e^{-αx^2}? I just did right now and my final answer is A= (2a)^{1/4}/\pi^{1/4}

I really appreciate your help, by the way.
 
Numnum said:
I'm not sure what you're asking. I multiplied by |e^{i\alpha t \hbar/m}| because to normalize a wave function I have to multiply by its complex conjugate and get e^0.

I know what you did, but I'm asking why you can multiply with some value like that? Doesn't that change the entire integral?

I mean, you have to calculate the integral of

|e^{\alpha x^2}||e^{-\alpha t \hbar / m}|

And instead of that, you calculate

|e^{\alpha x^2}||e^{-\alpha t \hbar / m}||e^{\alpha t \hbar / m}|

How do these two integrals relate?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K