How can the virial theorem be applied to a quantum particle in one dimension?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the virial theorem to a quantum particle in one dimension, specifically in the context of the Schrödinger equation and potential energy. The original poster seeks to demonstrate a relationship involving the expectation values of position and momentum operators in stationary states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers differentiating the expectation value of the product of position and momentum operators as a potential approach. Some participants suggest verifying the time independence of this expectation value in stationary states.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various hints and suggestions related to the problem. There is uncertainty about whether the reference provided by the original poster contains a complete solution, leading to further inquiries for clarification and additional hints.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a reference that may contain a solution, but its relevance and completeness are questioned. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the connection between the problem and the virial theorem.

subny
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A quantum particle, i.e. a particle obeying Schrödinger equation and
moving in one dimension experiences a potential ˆV (x). In a stationary state
of this system show that

⟨x∂/∂x(ˆV(x)⟩ = ⟨ˆp2/2m⟩

Hint: Consider the time dependence of ⟨ˆxˆp⟩.


Homework Equations



I was told the answer would be some variation of the virial theorem as proven here - http://www7b.biglobe.ne.jp/~kcy05t/viriproof.html#qua

but i do not get the connection

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking of doing it as per the hint - by trying to find the d/dt of <^x^p>

(something prefixed by a "^" signifies an operator - i.e "^p" is the momentum operator etc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just go with d/dt<x.p> and prove that <x.p> for stationary state is independent of time.Use the formula from the reference you already have for d/dt<O>,where O is some operator.
EDIT-wait,does not that reference already has solution.
 
Last edited:
hi

so i am confused now - does the reference already have the soln - i don't even see it !
 
hmm... any other hints or suggestions.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K