Azure Ace
How can you prove that there can only be 2 possible four-element group?
The discussion revolves around the proof of the assertion that there can only be two possible four-element groups in group theory. Participants explore various methods of proof, including Lagrange's theorem and the analysis of element orders, while addressing the implications of these methods on the structure of the groups.
Participants generally agree on the application of Lagrange's theorem and the implications of element orders, but there remains some uncertainty regarding the completeness of the proposed proofs and the nature of semidirect products. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the validity of the proof methods presented.
Some participants note that the discussion involves assumptions about the properties of groups and the definitions of element orders, which may not be fully resolved within the context of the thread.
fresh_42 said:This is basically correct. An element of order ##4## leads to ##\mathbb{Z}_4##. So there is only the possibility left, where we have only elements of order ##2##. Basically this can lead to the group ##\mathbb{Z}_2^2## and groups ##\mathbb{Z}_2 \rtimes_\varphi \mathbb{Z}_2##. Now we need an argument, why ##\varphi = 1## is the only possibility, i.e. why all semidirect products are already direct.
To your second question: What do you mean by "one element order"? If you mean, whether all group elements have to be of the same order, then the answer is no. E.g. ##\mathbf{Sym}(3) = \langle (1),(12),(123) \rangle## has elements of order ##2## and ##3##. Also ##1 \in \langle \mathbb{Z}_4 , + \rangle## is of order ##4## whereas ##2 \in \langle \mathbb{Z}_4 , + \rangle## is of order ##2##