How can two objects colliding and merging have a bigger mass?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter edoarad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of mass in the context of two colliding objects, particularly focusing on how their combined mass can exceed the sum of their rest masses. Participants explore the implications of kinetic energy conversion, temperature effects on mass, and the relationship between energy and mass as described by E=mc².

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the mass of the final object formed from two colliding equal mass objects is greater than the sum of their rest masses due to the conversion of kinetic energy into other forms of energy.
  • Others argue that the increase in mass is dependent on the relative speed of the objects before the collision.
  • A participant suggests that the additional kinetic energy from the collision may be converted into heat or internal energy, which contributes to the increased mass of the final system.
  • There is a question regarding whether a body whose mass has increased due to high temperature behaves the same as a body that is simply that massive, and what temperature would make the added mass significant.
  • Some participants clarify that heat is not the only form of energy, and the relationship between energy and mass is complex, depending on how one defines "using" energy.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of E=mc², with some participants noting that mass contains energy and energy has mass, leading to further exploration of how temperature can affect mass through equations involving Boltzmann's constant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the relationship between mass, energy, and temperature, and the discussion remains unresolved with no clear consensus on the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of energy and mass, as well as the unresolved nature of how temperature influences mass in practical terms.

edoarad
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
i've read that the mass of two objects which is formed when two equal objects collide must be twice the mass of the moving objects, which is grater then the sum of their rest mass. does it really happen in terms of particles? how is it explained?

thanks,
edo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that the mass of the final object depends on the relative speed of the two objects before colliding, if both have the same rest mass.
 
That is right...the extra kinetic energy must have gone somewhere...we might say that it is converted to heat or some other form of internal energy..but since energy equals mass, this extra energy will give a greater mass to the final system..thus it is also true that you can make a body more massive by just raising its temperature...Please refer the book on special relativity by Resnick...section 3.6..
 
thank you very much.
does a body whose mass has been increased by high temprature acts the same as though he was simply that massive? how hot must something be in order for the added mass not to be neglectable?
 
Heat isn't the only kind of energy. [math]E= mc^2[/math] so [math]m= E/c^2[/math]. How large that has to be to be "not neglectable" depends upon what you consider "negletable".
 
i thought that the energy from e=mc^2 is simply the energy that can be gained by using the mass, is that wrong?
 
Well, it depends on what you mean by "using". E = mc^2 is the amount of energy you'd get if you completely converted the mass into energy. For instance, by reacting matter and antimatter. If that's what you mean by "using", then sure, E = mc^2 is the amount of energy you can get. But a normal definition of "using" probably entails something like nuclear fusion, or burning - some process in which there's still some mass left at the end - and in that case you only get a small fraction of mc^2 as useful energy.
 
edoarad said:
i thought that the energy from e=mc^2 is simply the energy that can be gained by using the mass, is that wrong?
It works both ways: mass contains energy, energy has mass.
 
i think I've got it now, thank you.
 
  • #10
And if you want to do a small calculation to see how temperature can affect mass, just equate mc^2 and kT, where k is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature,,,,and calculate T for some amount of mass..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
954
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
10K