How Can Vector Analysis Improve Understanding of Mechanics Problems?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the application of vector analysis to solve mechanics problems, specifically involving a ladder's motion. Participants analyze the relationship between the velocities of the ladder's endpoints and its midpoint, using position vectors and differentiation to derive equations. Key equations include v cos(30°) = u cos(60°) and the differentiation of position vectors to relate velocities. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding instantaneous axes of rotation and the limitations of using them for angular acceleration calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Vector calculus fundamentals
  • Understanding of angular velocity and acceleration
  • Knowledge of position vectors and their differentiation
  • Familiarity with kinematics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between linear and angular motion in mechanics
  • Learn about instantaneous axes of rotation and their applications
  • Explore the differentiation of vector functions in physics
  • Investigate the role of position vectors in solving mechanics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and applied mathematics who are looking to deepen their understanding of vector analysis in mechanics problems.

  • #31
ehild said:
The solution is very simple if you choose the coordinate system so that point A is at (X,0) and point B is at (0,Y). Then the CM is at (X/2, Y/2) and

VCM= 0.5 (dX/dt, dY/dt)

As the length of the rod is constant, X2 + Y2=0, so

X dX/dt+Y dY/dt=0,

dX/dt=V, dY/dt=-(X/Y) V.

X/Y can be written with the angle of inclination, so you get dY/dt in terms of V and the angle.

ehild

I am pretty embarrassed by seeing such an elegantly simple solution :redface:

The problem is that I don't think in terms of vectors .Rather I was treating velocities as if they were scalar quantities .

Thanks ehild !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Tanya Sharma said:
The problem is that I don't think in terms of vectors .Rather I was treating velocities as if they were scalar quantities .

As some general advice to you and any other interested reader, you will find that kinematics are far easier (and arguably more intuitive) when you work with vectors. Vector analysis is an extremely powerful tool and is the foundation of much of mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #33
jhae2.718 said:
As some general advice to you and any other interested reader, you will find that kinematics are far easier (and arguably more intuitive) when you work with vectors. Vector analysis is an extremely powerful tool and is the foundation of much of mechanics.

Thank you very much for the advice.I really appreciate it.

Could you suggest me some book or reference material which specifically use vector analysis to tackle mechanics problems .The general introductory physics books hardly use vectors .
 
  • #34
Tanya Sharma said:
Use v = -ωLsinθ .

Substitute value of ω in the expression for α .

Thank you Tanya I got the answer.
 
  • #35
Tanya Sharma said:
Could you suggest me some book or reference material which specifically use vector analysis to tackle mechanics problems.

In my opinion there's a bit of a gap in mechanics textbooks between the simplistic treatments in introductory physics and sophomore-level dynamics and advanced treatments of analytical mechanics.

Depending on your level of mathematics (you should have at least basic and vector calculus; linear algebra is helpful, as is differential equations), I think Anil Rao's book Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies: A Systematic Approach isn't that bad of an option; I find myself in agreement with much of the principles Rao enumerates in the forward to his text on the necessity for teaching rigorous vector mechanics. I'm a little hesitant in this recommendation, as I think this may be too large a jump from basic introductory physics, but with some effort I think it should be manageable.

Also, keep in mind that I am an aerospace engineer and thus my approach to the subject is biased in that direction; some of the physicists here may chip in with other opinions.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K