How can we determine if a closed symmetric operator has self-adjoint extensions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nusc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A closed symmetric operator A has self-adjoint extensions if and only if its deficiency indices n_+ and n_- are equal. This relationship is established through von Neumann's theorem, which states that the set of self-adjoint extensions corresponds to the isomorphisms of L_+ onto L_-. Additionally, if there exists a conjugation C such that AC = CA, then A possesses equal deficiency indices, confirming the existence of self-adjoint extensions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proving closure and examining the associated resolvent operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of closed symmetric operators in functional analysis
  • Familiarity with deficiency indices in operator theory
  • Knowledge of von Neumann's theorem and its implications
  • Basic concepts of conjugation in the context of operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of von Neumann's theorem on self-adjoint extensions
  • Explore the concept of deficiency indices in greater detail
  • Investigate the properties of resolvent operators associated with symmetric operators
  • Learn about the role of conjugation in operator theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and graduate students specializing in functional analysis, particularly those studying operator theory and self-adjoint extensions.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
Let A be a closed symmetric operator with deficiency indices n_+/-.

A has self-adjoint extension iff n_+=n_-. In this case the set of self-adjoint extensions is in natural correspondence with the set of isomorphisms of L_+ onto L_-.

Isn't this just von Neumann's theorem?

Let A be a symmetric operator and suppose that there exists a conjugation C with C: dom A-> dom A and AC = CA. Then A has equal deficiency indices and therefore has self-adjoint extensions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I only know of a VN thm involving one-parameter unitary groups of operators. Your problem looks as if you have to prove closure and to look at the associated resolvent operator.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K