How Can We Determine If GCD(a+b, a-b) Equals 1 or 2 When GCD(a, b) Is 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teroenza
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the GCD of (a+b) and (a-b) given that GCD(a, b) = 1, establishing that GCD(a+b, a-b) can only be 1 or 2. The proof involves showing that any common divisor d of (a+b) and (a-b) must also divide 2a and 2b, leading to the conclusion that d cannot exceed 2. The participants suggest using the Euclidean algorithm for further exploration and testing specific cases to differentiate when the GCD equals 1 or 2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of GCD (Greatest Common Divisor) and its properties
  • Familiarity with the Euclidean algorithm for GCD calculations
  • Basic knowledge of number theory concepts, particularly relative primality
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving integers
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the Euclidean algorithm for GCD calculations in depth
  • Investigate properties of relatively prime integers and their implications
  • Learn about GCD properties in modular arithmetic contexts
  • Test various integer pairs to observe GCD behavior in practice
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory, particularly those studying GCD properties and their applications in algebra.

teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Given that GCD(a,b)=1 , i.e. they are relatively prime, show that the GCD(a+b,a-b) is 1 or 2.


Homework Equations


am+bn=1 , for some integer m,n.


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using k(a+b)+L(a-b)=1 or 2, but got nowhere. So I said, if d is the common divisor of (a+b,a-b), d divides the sum or difference of the two.

(a+b)+(a-b)=2a

(a+b)-(a-b)=2b

so d divides either if these. 2 is a common factor between the sum and difference, so I initially thought 2 is then a common factor of (a+b,a-b). I have tried inserting numbers and this is incorrect for some pairs. For example (a,b)=(3,2), and correct for others (3,1). I am not seeing how to differentiate these two cases.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what you can say is if d>2, then in order for d to divide (2a,2b), d (odd d) or d/2 (even d) must divide (a,b), which is impossible, so d<=2.
 
I was able to get it by multiplying am+bn=1 by two, and saying that d then divides 2. 2 is prime, and thus d must be 1 or 2. This has not been verified by grading, but is what i am submitting.
 
Your proof is close to correct; really all that's missing is correctly reflecting upon what you've done.

You've shown that, if d divides GCD(a+b,a-b), then d divides GCD(2a,2b) = 2. This is enough to answer the problem.


And because this was only an "if P then Q" type statement, you should expect the possibility that Q could be true, but P not.


If you want to go further and predict exactly when you get 1 and when you get 2, there are at least two things to try:
  • Use the fact you already know the GCD is 1 or 2, and devise an alternate way to directly test if 2 is the case
  • Try refining your argument -- the Euclidean algorithm is often useful for GCD problems, even when working with symbolic arguments instead of explicit numbers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K