Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around finding a probability space and events \(A\), \(B\), and \(C\) such that the conditional probability \(P[C \mid A]\) is greater than \(P[C \mid A \cup B]\). Participants explore examples and calculations to illustrate this concept, focusing on the relationships between the events and their associated probabilities.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Mathematical reasoning
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants propose using genetic modifications as examples for events \(A\) and \(B\), with \(C\) representing the occurrence of a certain condition.
- One participant calculates probabilities based on assumed values for \(P(A)\), \(P(B)\), \(P(A \mid C)\), \(P(B \mid C)\), and \(P(C)\), but questions the correctness of the results.
- Another participant suggests that adjustments to the probabilities may be necessary to satisfy the inequality condition.
- Participants reference an external example involving different events \(V_1\), \(V_2\), and \(K\) to demonstrate a case where the inequality holds, performing calculations to verify this.
- There is a discussion about ensuring that all calculated probabilities remain valid (between 0 and 1) to maintain a valid probability function.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express uncertainty regarding the initial calculations and whether the proposed probabilities satisfy the required inequality. While some calculations are verified as correct, there remains a lack of consensus on the initial example's validity and the need for adjustments.
Contextual Notes
Participants acknowledge the importance of ensuring that all probabilities are valid and that the calculations must adhere to the properties of probability spaces. There are unresolved questions about the correctness of initial assumptions and calculations.