How Can We Improvise Buoyancy Control for a Mini-Submarine Without Using a BCD?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter metz143
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around improvising buoyancy control for a mini-submarine without using a traditional buoyancy control device (BCD). Participants explore various alternative methods and designs, focusing on DIY solutions, mechanical devices, and the implications of buoyancy in underwater environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using a ballast tank system similar to those in real submarines, while others propose mechanical devices that utilize flexible membranes or balloons to control buoyancy.
  • One idea involves using a compressed gas tank wrapped in a sealed plastic bag to create buoyancy, with a valve to control gas release and water displacement.
  • Another participant mentions the importance of maintaining slightly negative buoyancy to allow for easier adjustments with the buoyancy control device.
  • Concerns are raised about the stability of buoyancy control, particularly regarding the effects of water pressure on air bladders or balloons at depth.
  • Some participants argue for the use of rigid ballast tanks that can use compressed air to manage buoyancy, while others emphasize the need for lightweight designs to minimize negative buoyancy.
  • There is discussion about the potential for a jettisonable ballast system as a safety feature, with suggestions for incorporating pressure switches to automate the release at certain depths.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of competing views on the best methods for buoyancy control, with no consensus reached on a single solution. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed designs.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the assumptions about air supply, the effects of water pressure on buoyancy devices, and the need for careful design to ensure stability and control.

  • #31
You have some good points there. Now that you mention a lathe, and internal threading, I see where our approach differs. I'm thinking that it should be split longitudinally, like a hot-dog bun; you're looking at an end-to-end joint. While I think that your way would still limit internal access, it would certainly be easier to implement.
The reason that I was thinking of a totally sealed hull rather than merely a water-tight equipment bay is that the whole machine then contributes to buoyancy. With a leaky hull, air bladders would have to be incorporated. That still might be a more practical way to do it, though, as long as there's room in there for them.
As you said, there's no particular need for the motor(s) to be waterproof; I just tend to be as redundant as is practical, in this case because I suspect that there will be accidental leakage no matter how careful they are. While the other electrical bits can be individually waterproofed with silicone, latex, epoxy, or whatever, it's tougher to do with a motor. Not only does the shaft-seal have to be proper, but there's then the possibility of it overheating if confined. That 'grease sandwich' shaft seal that you mentioned is quite a cool idea. I've never heard of that before. While it probably wouldn't take a lot of depth, it might work well for something like this. (How deep did your machine go, by the way?)

edit: I finally got the thing into ImageShack. This is just in case anyone didn't quite follow what I was talking about.
"[IMG[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
757
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
16K
Replies
22
Views
4K