How Can We Improvise Buoyancy Control for a Mini-Submarine Without Using a BCD?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter metz143
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on improvising buoyancy control for a mini-submarine without using a traditional Buoyancy Control Device (BCD). Participants suggest various DIY methods, including a ballast tank system, mechanical devices using flexible membranes, and compressed gas systems. Key recommendations include using a lightweight design with minimal negative buoyancy and incorporating safety features like jettisonable ballast and pressure switches. The discussion emphasizes the importance of material selection, with fiberglass and thin sheet aluminum being viable options for construction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy principles and submarine design
  • Familiarity with mechanical systems, including screwjacks and pneumatic devices
  • Knowledge of materials suitable for underwater applications, such as fiberglass and aluminum
  • Basic electronics for integrating pressure sensors and control systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research DIY ballast tank systems for underwater vehicles
  • Learn about pressure sensor design and calibration techniques
  • Explore the use of compressed gas systems in buoyancy control
  • Investigate submersible DC motors and their applications in mini-submarines
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, hobbyists designing underwater vehicles, and anyone interested in DIY buoyancy control systems for submersibles.

  • #31
You have some good points there. Now that you mention a lathe, and internal threading, I see where our approach differs. I'm thinking that it should be split longitudinally, like a hot-dog bun; you're looking at an end-to-end joint. While I think that your way would still limit internal access, it would certainly be easier to implement.
The reason that I was thinking of a totally sealed hull rather than merely a water-tight equipment bay is that the whole machine then contributes to buoyancy. With a leaky hull, air bladders would have to be incorporated. That still might be a more practical way to do it, though, as long as there's room in there for them.
As you said, there's no particular need for the motor(s) to be waterproof; I just tend to be as redundant as is practical, in this case because I suspect that there will be accidental leakage no matter how careful they are. While the other electrical bits can be individually waterproofed with silicone, latex, epoxy, or whatever, it's tougher to do with a motor. Not only does the shaft-seal have to be proper, but there's then the possibility of it overheating if confined. That 'grease sandwich' shaft seal that you mentioned is quite a cool idea. I've never heard of that before. While it probably wouldn't take a lot of depth, it might work well for something like this. (How deep did your machine go, by the way?)

edit: I finally got the thing into ImageShack. This is just in case anyone didn't quite follow what I was talking about.
"[IMG[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
16K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K