How Can We Improvise Buoyancy Control for a Mini-Submarine Without Using a BCD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter metz143
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on alternative buoyancy control methods for a mini-submarine without using a traditional buoyancy control device (BCD). Participants suggest various DIY solutions, including a ballast tank system and mechanical devices like a rubber membrane chamber that can be inflated or deflated to control buoyancy. The importance of maintaining a slightly negative buoyancy is emphasized to ensure the sub can rise or sink with minimal adjustments. Additionally, safety features such as a jettisonable ballast and pressure switches are proposed to prevent sinking too deep. The group is also considering materials for construction and exploring options for submersible motors and pressure sensors.
  • #31
You have some good points there. Now that you mention a lathe, and internal threading, I see where our approach differs. I'm thinking that it should be split longitudinally, like a hot-dog bun; you're looking at an end-to-end joint. While I think that your way would still limit internal access, it would certainly be easier to implement.
The reason that I was thinking of a totally sealed hull rather than merely a water-tight equipment bay is that the whole machine then contributes to buoyancy. With a leaky hull, air bladders would have to be incorporated. That still might be a more practical way to do it, though, as long as there's room in there for them.
As you said, there's no particular need for the motor(s) to be waterproof; I just tend to be as redundant as is practical, in this case because I suspect that there will be accidental leakage no matter how careful they are. While the other electrical bits can be individually waterproofed with silicone, latex, epoxy, or whatever, it's tougher to do with a motor. Not only does the shaft-seal have to be proper, but there's then the possibility of it overheating if confined. That 'grease sandwich' shaft seal that you mentioned is quite a cool idea. I've never heard of that before. While it probably wouldn't take a lot of depth, it might work well for something like this. (How deep did your machine go, by the way?)

edit: I finally got the thing into ImageShack. This is just in case anyone didn't quite follow what I was talking about.
"[IMG[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
16K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K