How can we increase animal size?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eagle9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Animal increase
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential genetic manipulation of organisms, particularly rodents and primates, to increase their size significantly. Key points include the role of the hormone somatotropin in promoting growth, with references to its use in medical treatments for growth deficiencies. The conversation highlights the challenges of increasing size due to physiological constraints, such as the square-cube law, which explains why larger animals face structural support issues. Gene manipulation has shown success in increasing size in farmed fish, but achieving a dramatic increase akin to fictional characters like King Kong raises questions about sustainability and ecological viability. The feasibility of using growth hormones as a simpler alternative to genetic modification is also discussed. Overall, while there are avenues for size enhancement, significant biological limitations and ethical considerations remain prominent in the conversation.
Eagle9
Messages
238
Reaction score
10
This is a continuation of my previous topic Is there any linkage between historic Oxygen levels in Earth's atmosphere and organism size?

So, let’s forget about primitive organisms and turn our attention to higher ones, for example rodents, primates :oldsmile:

Are there any genes discovered that are responsible for their size? Rats in my laboratory (I made research on them) seldom grow more than 20 cm, but imagine that I want to have a rat of 60 cm long. What genes should be transferred into their genome? Has such experiment been done? Is it possible after all? If it is possible then we could make a King-Kong from an ordinary chimpanzee (and let’s forget for a while about the ethical issues), such experiment would be very interesting and outstanding, or maybe again nobody cares about such possibility? :oldeyes:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Eagle9 said:
Is it possible after all? If it is possible then we could make a King-Kong from an ordinary chimpanzee (and let’s forget for a while about the ethical issues)
Never mind ethical problems - King Kong can't exist for many perfectly physiological reasons.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, jim mcnamara and BillTre
You are asking about gigantism, in part. The hormone somatotropin causes people and animals to be oversized at lot. So one answer is to change levels of this hormone in your rodents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantism

Physicians use this hormone to help patients with growth hormone deficits. -
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262362/

As @DaveC426913 noted - there are problems with mass increasing much faster than length, so that structures no longer support the animal.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
Breeding, over thousands of years has produced animals larger than the species from which they arose, for example some dog breeds are larger than wolves.

Gene manipulation has produced rapid size increases (in one generation) in some farmed fish, often from over expressing growth hormones or their relatives. These are not vast increases like King Kong, but maybe around 2x.

Making triploid fish (three sets of chromosome, rather than two) results in sterile fish. As a result they put their excess metabolic energy that would have gone into making eggs and sperm into body growth. Again not like King Kong.

Making smaller animals is something more commonly done (probably because its easier).

@DaveC426913's comment makes an important point. As organisms get larger, size effects will have to be compensated for (probably by additional mutations).
 
Not really a technical response, but the discussion reminds me of the known, intentional, crossbreed of the lion and the tiger. One of the results is a very very huge, oversized cat. This makes one wonder how well such a cat would do if it occurred in the wild. The overly gigantic cat did not evolve naturally, so this makes one wonder; advantages gained? advantages lost?
 
BillTre said:
Breeding, over thousands of years has produced animals larger than the species from which they arose, for example some dog breeds are larger than wolves.
Like this one?

1617644114905.png
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes phinds and BillTre
symbolipoint said:
Not really a technical response, but the discussion reminds me of the known, intentional, crossbreed of the lion and the tiger. One of the results is a very very huge, oversized cat. This makes one wonder how well such a cat would do if it occurred in the wild. The overly gigantic cat did not evolve naturally, so this makes one wonder; advantages gained? advantages lost?
Also what niches could it utilize to get get what it needs to live.
When I see many of the super-sized animals of cinematic fame, I am wondering where would something like a King Kong (warm blooded, thus using about 10x the energy of a similarly sized cold blooded animal) get enough food in a day to survive. On the other hand, its poop deposits would be an impressive source of nutrients/fertilizer.
 
Is what we see in post #7, a photographic trick?
 
  • #10
BillTre said:
Also what niches could it utilize to get get what it needs to live.
When I see many of the super-sized animals of cinematic fame, I am wondering where would something like a King Kong (warm blooded, thus using about 10x the energy of a similarly sized cold blooded animal) get enough food in a day to survive. On the other hand, its poop deposits would be an impressive source of nutrients/fertilizer.
Yes I was pointing to things like that. Elephants are big, but they are grazers(or something that way). Extra gigantic big cats need to hunt something. Not exactly clear how they earn their daily living. That would be about question if they lived in the wild.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #11
BillTre said:
...I am wondering where would something ... get enough food in a day to survive.
True. Although, considering the OP is talking about increased oxygen levels, we might not want to assume the biosphere isn't likewise unchanged.

(A triple negative is still a negative, right?)
 
  • #12
DaveC426913
Never mind ethical problems - King Kong can't exist for many perfectly physiological reasons.
I want to know which physiological reasons prevent this :oldsmile:jim mcnamara
You are asking about gigantism, in part. The hormone somatotropin causes people and animals to be oversized at lot. So one answer is to change levels of this hormone in your rodents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantism
And it will help to boost a monkey’s (macaques for example) size from current 41-70 cm to let’s say two meters? It would be interesting to see such monkey :oldeyes:

As @DaveC426913 noted - there are problems with mass increasing much faster than length, so that structures no longer support the animal.
I do not imply/plan to receive an animal of 100 meter size, but “just” to increase its size 2-3 times.

BillTre
Gene manipulation has produced rapid size increases (in one generation) in some farmed fish, often from over expressing growth hormones or their relatives.
So, if the growth hormones are the key circumstance then can we “feed” animal with them? This would be much cheaper that gene manipulation.

And which genes are involved in this process?

These are not vast increases like King Kong, but maybe around 2x.
This would be enough

symbolipoint
Not really a technical response, but the discussion reminds me of the known, intentional, crossbreed of the lion and the tiger. One of the results is a very very huge, oversized cat.
Who and when did such experiment? I can’t recall, perhaps I missed something? :cool:
 
  • #13
Eagle9 said:
I want to know which physiological reasons prevent this :oldsmile:

Galileo's Square-Cube Law. It's why ants have stick-legs while elephants have tree-trunk legs.
(It's also why elephants can't jump.)

Body weight goes up as the cube of the linear dimension, whereas strength goes up as the cross-section (square). Any larger and you can't have separate legs - you just get a slug-like critter.

It also has myriad consequences elsewhere, such as the surface area of the lungs, the pumping ability of the heart, muscle strength, etc.

The strength of muscles is proportional to their as the cross-section , so it only squares as the critters linear dimensions double - whereas the critter's mass cubes. At some scale, a critter such as Kong or Godzilla is so massive its muscles are maxed out simply holding its own body up and cannot lift anything more (see elephant jumping, above).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes hmmm27
  • #14
symbolipoint
Not really a technical response, but the discussion reminds me of the known, intentional, crossbreed of the lion and the tiger. One of the results is a very very huge, oversized cat.
Who and when did such experiment? I can’t recall, perhaps I missed something?
Eagle9,
You'll have to just do some common literature searching to find the answers you want on that. Your community or any school library, good place to start. You can also do an information search through the internet and find what you are curious to know. Who first made such a cross-specie experiment? I don't know; only it has been done and results shown. You search!
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
Back
Top