How can we recognize standard integrals here

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals Standard
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral $\int \sqrt{x^2-4} \,dx$, exploring various methods for solving it, including integration by parts and substitutions. Participants share their approaches and reasoning, examining both standard integral techniques and specific substitutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using integration by parts for the integral, but express uncertainty about its effectiveness.
  • Others suggest that trigonometric substitution is a more familiar method, with one participant mentioning a preference for this approach.
  • A participant introduces hyperbolic substitution, specifically $x = 2\cosh(t)$, and discusses its limitations for $x < 2$.
  • Another participant points out that the secant substitution can handle both $x > 2$ and $x < -2$, but questions whether the solution is complete without addressing both ranges.
  • There is a back-and-forth about the implications of returning to the original integral during the integration by parts process, with one participant suggesting a method to simplify the problem.
  • Some participants express confusion about the necessity of including a constant of integration in their solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for solving the integral. Multiple competing views remain regarding the effectiveness of different substitution techniques and the completeness of the solutions provided.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that certain substitutions may only apply to specific ranges of $x$, leading to discussions about the completeness of the solutions. There is also mention of the potential for returning to the original integral during the process, which complicates the reasoning.

Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Also, how would you do $\int \sqrt{x^2-4}$?

$$d(x^2-4)^{3/2}=3x\sqrt{x^2-4} \,dx$$
$$\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-4}}{3x}d(x^2-4)^{3/2}$$

Not sure how partial integration will be useful here. What standard integrals do you see?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Their steps are way too convoluted. I'm used to doing trig substitution, but ILS just granted me power...I feel it..(Cool)

I got it!

For $x\ge 2$:
$$\int\sqrt{x^2-4} \,dx=\int \frac{x^2-4}{\sqrt{x^2-4}}dx=\int \frac{x^2}{\sqrt{x^2-4}}-\frac{4}{\sqrt{x^2-4}}dx=\int x \,d(\sqrt{x^2-4)}-4 \arcosh(x/2)$$

For $x\le 2$:
$$=\int x \,d(\sqrt{x^2-4)}+4 \arcosh(-x/2)$$ $$
 
Last edited:
Rido12 said:
Also, how would you do $\int \sqrt{x^2-4}$?

$$d(x^2-4)^{3/2}=3x\sqrt{x^2-4} \,dx$$
$$\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-4}}{3x}d(x^2-4)^{3/2}$$

Not sure how partial integration will be useful here. What standard integrals do you see?

Indeed. That partial integration isn't going in the right direction. (Doh)
Rido12 said:
Their steps are way too convoluted. I'm used to doing trig substitution, but ILS just granted me power...I feel it..(Cool)

Impressive Luke. I recognize the power in you. (Bigsmile)
$$=\int x \,d(\sqrt{x^2-4)}+4 \arcosh(x/2)$$

Yes... but what is $$\int x \,d(\sqrt{x^2-4})$$? (Wondering)
 
We use integration by parts, or "partial differentiation" (Cool)
$$\displaystyle \int x \,d(\sqrt{x^2-4})$$
$$=\frac{x^2}{\sqrt{x^2-4}}-\int \sqrt{x^2-4}$$

Shoot, we are back to the original problem. I'm lagging, but I'll explain what I would do if I wasn't lagging. I would add $\int \sqrt{x^2-4}$ to both sides, and if we call the original integral "$I$", then the resulting integral would be "$2I$", so we can divide everything by two and arrive at our answer :D
Would you suggest a different method? (Wondering) Let us assume that I have added "$+C" to everything okay (Tmi)?
 
Rido12 said:
We use integration by parts, or "partial differentiation" (Cool)
$$\displaystyle \int x \,d(\sqrt{x^2-4})$$
$$=\frac{x^2}{\sqrt{x^2-4}}-\int \sqrt{x^2-4}$$

Shoot, we are back to the original problem. I'm lagging, but I'll explain what I would do if I wasn't lagging. I would add $\int \sqrt{x^2-4}$ to both sides, and if we call the original integral "$I$", then the resulting integral would be "$2I$", so we can divide everything by two and arrive at our answer :D

Perfect! ;)
Would you suggest a different method? (Wondering)

Not really.
But alternatively we can do a $\cosh$ substitution, since we're looking at a hyperbolic pattern.
Let us assume that I have added "$+C" to everything okay (Tmi)?

But why? (Wondering)
You have an indefinite integral everywhere that effectively contains an invisible $+C$. (Wink)
 
Rido12 said:
Also, how would you do $\int \sqrt{x^2-4}$?

$$d(x^2-4)^{3/2}=3x\sqrt{x^2-4} \,dx$$
$$\int \frac{\sqrt{x^2-4}}{3x}d(x^2-4)^{3/2}$$

Not sure how partial integration will be useful here. What standard integrals do you see?

This method is not going to work. Your options are either to substitute $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = 2\cosh{(t)} \implies \mathrm{d}x = 2\sinh{(t)} \, \mathrm{d}t \end{align*}$ or to substitute $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = 2\sec{(t)} \implies \mathrm{d}x = 2\sec{(t)}\tan{(t)}\,\mathrm{d}t \end{align*}$.
 
Thanks Prove It!

This question was pulled out from my other thread, in which I was not satisfied that the substitution $x=2\cosh(t)$ only yields for $x>2$, whereas the secant substitution yields for $x>2$ and $x<-2$. Turns out that I had to use the substitution $x=-2\cosh(t)$ so that it would work for $x<-2$. Not sure whether people would consider the answer defined only for $x>2$ to be "complete", or if I had to get it for the negative portion, too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K