MHB How Can You Determine the Sum of an Infinite Geometric Series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hatelove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Estimate
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the sum of an infinite geometric series, specifically the series where each term is half of the previous one. It highlights that while there is no universal method for calculating the sum of all convergent series, certain well-behaved series, like the one presented, can be summed easily. The series in question converges to 2, and the method suggested by Ackbach is mentioned as a way to find this sum without extensive calculations. The conversation emphasizes the computability theory aspect, noting that most series do not have computable sums. Ultimately, understanding the properties of geometric series can simplify the process of finding their sums.
hatelove
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
i.e.

\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{n}} = \frac{1}{2^{0}} + \frac{1}{2^{1}} + \frac{1}{2^{2}} + \frac{1}{2^{3}} + \frac{1}{2^{4}} + \frac{1}{2^{5}} + \frac{1}{2^{6}} + \cdots = ~1.99138889...

Is there a way you can know this solution is 2 without having to perform all of the calculations I did to find which number the sums are approaching? And is there a general method for questions like these to find the solution without having to perform a lot of calculations?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
daigo said:
i.e.

\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{n}} = \frac{1}{2^{0}} + \frac{1}{2^{1}} + \frac{1}{2^{2}} + \frac{1}{2^{3}} + \frac{1}{2^{4}} + \frac{1}{2^{5}} + \frac{1}{2^{6}} + \cdots = ~1.99138889...

Is there a way you can know this solution is 2 without having to perform all of the calculations I did to find which number the sums are approaching? And is there a general method for questions like these to find the solution without having to perform a lot of calculations?

There is no general method to determine the sum of a convergent series, it is a result of computability theory that almost all such series are not even computable. This one however is well behaved and its sum can be found using the method sugested by Ackbach

CB
 
Last edited:
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K