How Can You Prove the Laplace Transform of t^n?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Laplace Transform of t^n is definitively expressed as n!/s^(n+1). This conclusion is derived from the definition of the Laplace transform, L {f(t)} = ∫_{0}^{∞} f(t) e^{-st} dt. To prove this expression rigorously, integration by parts is essential, particularly when generalizing the transformation for t^n. The discussion emphasizes the importance of differentiating the Laplace transform with respect to s to facilitate the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace Transforms
  • Familiarity with integration by parts
  • Basic knowledge of differential calculus
  • Experience with MATLAB for computational verification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Laplace Transform using integration by parts
  • Learn about the properties of Laplace Transforms, including linearity and shifting
  • Explore MATLAB functions for symbolic integration and Laplace Transform calculations
  • Investigate the application of Laplace Transforms in solving ordinary differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering and mathematics, particularly those studying control systems and differential equations, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for educators seeking to enhance their teaching of Laplace Transforms.

seang
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
Our professor asked us to derive an expression for the laplace transfrom of t^n. I did a few examples in MatLab and gathered that the Laplace Transform of t^n = n!/s^(n+1). I'm pretty sure this is correct, but I don't think my professor will be happy with it. I don't really know how I should go about proving it in a more sturdy way. I know I can integrate by parts for specific examples, but I'm not versed in integrating by parts with n's.

Any Suggestions?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't see how you can get away without doing integration by parts. What is the definition of the Laplace transform?

<br /> L \{f(t) \} = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(t) e^{-st} dt<br />
BTW, you know that the n's are constants, right?
 
Last edited:
Let's say if you have

x(t) \iff X(s)

and you wish to find the Laplace transform of

t x(t)

Differentiate with respect to s of the Laplace transform integral. That is

\frac {d}{ds} \int_{0^-}^\infty t x(t) e^{-st} dt

You may move the derivative inside the integral and differentiate the exponential of the integrand.

Doing so you will see that t x(t) \iff - \frac {dX(s)}{s}

Try generalizing this for t^n. Note that for your specific problem

x(t) = t
 
Most likely this can only be answered by an "old timer". I am making measurements on an uA709 op amp (metal can). I would like to calculate the frequency rolloff curves (I can measure them). I assume the compensation is via the miller effect. To do the calculations I would need to know the gain of the transistors and the effective resistance seen at the compensation terminals, not including the values I put there. Anyone know those values?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K