How Did Graphene Research Lead to a Nobel Prize in Physics?

Click For Summary
Russian-born scientists Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for their pioneering work with graphene, a one-atom-thick carbon material with significant potential for advancing electronics. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences highlighted graphene's properties, noting its transparency and conductivity, which could lead to innovations in transparent touch screens, light panels, and solar cells. The discussion also touched on the appropriateness of awarding the prize in physics versus chemistry, with some arguing that graphene research has had a more substantial impact on physics. The conversation shifted towards the broader implications of nationality in scientific achievements, with participants debating the influence of immigration and funding on Nobel laureates' success. The dialogue emphasized the importance of recognizing individual contributions to science rather than attributing success solely based on nationality. Concerns about funding cuts to research in the UK and the US were also raised, highlighting the potential impact on future scientific advancements.
  • #31
rhody said:
I hesitated before posting the BBC article, knowing full well that some may take offense to it. I think anything these days that stirs "Nationalist" feelings these days is not a good thing.
With what I just said, does that make sense ? No offense was intended.

Rhody...

I didn't take offense! Sorry Rhody, the last part about nationalism wasn't a reply to your post, I wasn't suggesting that you thought that or took credit for their work, I just thought it was germane to the conversation. After all, comparisons between countries were being made, and there is a tendency to associate oneself with a country.

Ygggdrasil said:
I think the statistics on laureates that Rhody posted are less indicative of which nationalities/ethnicities are more or less intelligent, but instead reflect which national governments provide the most funding for scientific research and are therefore able to attract the best scientists. Something to keep in mind as the UK plans significant cuts to science.

I know, 'apparently' other major European countries are maintaing or even increasing theirs. There's also this rather scary 'increasing the cap on tuition fees' thing being considered. Just another step the UK is taking to impede the life chances of the people who live here. Impeding the opportunity they may have to make a contribution to science (I know that just a moment ago I was arguing against nationality, but I did also say that, like Gokul, the country in which people lives does have an effect on whether or not individuals living in that country can reach their potential).
Again, sorry Rhody, that wasn't levelled at you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Impeding the opportunity they may have to make a contribution to science (I know that just a moment ago I was arguing against nationality, but I did also say that, like Gokul, the country in which people lives does have an effect on whether or not individuals living in that country can reach their potential).
Again, sorry Rhody, that wasn't levelled at you!

Nobahar,

No offense taken, Gokul and you have made a valid argument, it seems that all of Europe is in a similar predicament, attempting to bring deficits in line with spending, and to reduce existing deficits. It is a sad fact that when a period of austerity is imposed on a country, one of the first areas hit is R&D in every sector of the scientific community. That being sad, we in the US are not far behind you. When people are suffering history repeated shows that it takes little kindling to ignite Nationalism with all of it's devastating consequences. Sorry for taking this thread off topic. Wanted to make this clear.

Rhody...
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K