A How Did Scientists Calculate the Orbital Radius of Jupiter's Moons?

Click For Summary
Scientists calculated the orbital radius of Jupiter's moons by measuring the angular distance from Jupiter to the moons using telescopes. The formula D = θ d / 206,265 allows for the calculation of linear size based on angular size and distance. Observations during opposition, when the moon is farthest from Jupiter, can enhance accuracy, but multiple measurements over orbits provide better estimates. Historical methods, such as Römer's 17th-century work on the speed of light, contributed to understanding the distance to Jupiter, although his initial calculations had significant errors. Overall, precise measurements and historical advancements have shaped our knowledge of Jovian moon orbits.
Forcino
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How did the first scientists figure out the orbital radius of a moon of Jupiter? How can observations lead to a calculation of the orbital radius of a moon of another planet?
How did the first scientists figure out the orbital radius of a moon of Jupiter? How can observations lead to a calculation of the orbital radius of a moon of another planet?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thank you.

So would you find the orbital radius of a Jovian moon by using a telescope to view Jupiter at opposition during a time when the moon is farthest from Jupiter? Then you could find the arcseconds of angle from the center of Jupiter to the center of the moon? Then you could use the equation D = θ d / 206,265? Then D would be the orbital radius of the moon?
 
Yeah, although:
1. it doesn't really have to be at opposition
2. you'd need to measure the angular distance of the moon over several/many orbits to get a good estimate of the maximum orbital radius.
 
How did the scientists figure out distance to Jupiter back in 17th century? Römer measured speed of light by 1676, but he got the speed about 30% too slow. How much of it was the error in travel time, how much the error in distance to Jupiter?
How much was Römer´s distance in 1676 better than Galilei´s distance, if any, in 1610?
 
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K