MHB How Did They Derive the Expression for P(Exactly One Match)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Usagi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how the expression for P(exactly one match) was derived. One participant suggests a straightforward approach by defining events A, B, and C for matching colors in specific boxes, calculating P(exactly one match) as P(A) + P(B) + P(C) = 1/2. Another participant acknowledges that this method is valid but seeks clarification on the original derivation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in probability expressions and invites further explanation. The inquiry remains open for additional insights on the derivation process.
Usagi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, really simple question but...

http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/5447/ballsra.jpg

I'm not quite sure on how they ended up with the expression for P(exactly one match). I would have done it in a more straight forward way, simply define A: matching the colour red in the red box only. B: matching the colour blue in the blue box only and C: matching the colour white in the white box only.

So P(exactly one match) = P(A)+P(B)+P(C) = \frac{3}{6} = \frac{1}{2}

How exactly did they get their expression?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Usagi said:
So P(exactly one match) = P(A)+P(B)+P(C) = \frac{3}{6} = \frac{1}{2}
Yes, this also works.

Usagi said:
How exactly did they get their expression?
See https://driven2services.com/staging/mh/index.php?threads/788/.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top