How do branes challenge our understanding of spacetime and geometry?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rodsika
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Branes challenge traditional concepts of spacetime and geometry by acting as both objects and submanifolds within spacetime. Specifically, D-branes allow open strings to terminate on them, creating a complex relationship between geometry and physical entities. This duality is essential in string theory, where branes represent non-perturbative sectors, while their properties, such as finite tension and charge, enable interactions with gravitational fields. The discussion emphasizes that understanding branes requires moving beyond simplistic definitions to grasp their role in advanced theoretical frameworks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with string theory concepts, particularly D-branes and their properties.
  • Understanding of General Relativity and its implications on geometry and physical reality.
  • Knowledge of solitons and classical field configurations in theoretical physics.
  • Basic grasp of conformal field theory and its application to string theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of D-branes in string theory and their implications for particle physics.
  • Study the mathematical framework of General Relativity and its relationship with physical geometry.
  • Explore solitons and their significance in classical field theories.
  • Investigate conformal field theory and its applications in understanding boundary conditions in string theory.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, string theorists, and advanced students in physics who are exploring the complexities of spacetime, geometry, and the implications of branes in modern physics.

rodsika
Messages
278
Reaction score
2
Branes are confusing subject. Branes are objects. Yet Branes are also Spacetime. But how could that be. General Relativity says geometry is not physical, but just math relationship. Now how could Branes itself be spacetime when Branes are objects like strings?

http://universe-review.ca/R15-18-string.htm says:

"D-branes - A D-brane is a submanifold of space-time with the property that open strings can end or begin on it. Strings can have various kinds of boundary conditions. For example closed strings have periodic boundary conditions (the string comes back onto itself)."

and

"Branes are not merely places; they are also objects that possesses finite tension and carry charges. Thus, they can be distorted and can interact with other charged objects and gravitational field"

Branes are supposed to be submanifold of spacetime. But spacetime is just an abstract mathematical idea, how could branes or spacetime submanifold contain charges?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rodsika said:
General Relativity says geometry is not physical, but just math relationship.

There is no difference in shape between the Earth and a bottle of beer?

rodsika said:
Branes are supposed to be submanifold of spacetime. But spacetime is just an abstract mathematical idea, how could branes or spacetime submanifold contain charges?!

No, they _occupy_ a submanifold of spacetime. Think eg of a rubber band stretched around a tube.

rodsika said:
http://universe-review.ca/R15-18-string.htm says:

"D-branes - A D-brane is a submanifold of space-time with the property that open strings can end or begin on it. Strings can have various kinds of boundary conditions. For example closed strings have periodic boundary conditions (the string comes back onto itself)."

This definition "where open strings can end" has created confusion without end and unfortunately has been copied all the time without illuminating anybody.

A brane is simply a certain extended classical field configuration, or solution of the equations of motions, call it soliton if you like. Depending on the boundary conditions, the fields are concentrated in certain regions ("submanifolds") of spacetime. Such branes correspond to non-perturbative sectors in the closed string theory.

A D-brane is a "dual" formulation of such a brane, for which the non-perturbative sector of closed strings is reformulated in terms of the perturbative sector of open strings. In other words, the extended soliton is transformed into a "local" degree of freedom, which in the language of conformal field theory can be represented by certain boundary conditions of open strings (namely regions "where open strings can end").

Note that D-branes are special in this and more general branes cannot be transformed to simple boundary conditions for open strings. So focusing on this "where open strings can end" does not capture the essence of branes, this is just a feature of a subclass of branes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K