How do copper oxide solar cells work?

AI Thread Summary
Copper oxide solar cells utilize cuprous oxide as a semiconductor, where oxygen acts as a dopant, enabling the formation of a p-n junction. Unlike traditional solar cells that rely on two doped materials, these cells can function with a copper electrode, which is not a semiconductor. The discussion highlights the unique properties of cuprous oxide, emphasizing its semiconductor characteristics despite the absence of conventional doping. Additionally, the conversation touches on the concept of Schottky diodes, noting their requirement for doping, which differentiates them from copper oxide solar cells. Overall, the forum provides insights into the operational principles of copper oxide solar cells and their distinct mechanisms.
askingask
Messages
90
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
Cuprous oxide - copper solar cells have not been doped, yet they work. What is going on, if no PN-junction exists here.
So basically, I‘ve always been told that solar cells work because of the PN-junction that exists between two doped materials. Then I‘d like to ask, how do solar cells work that use cuprous oxide - copper electrodes. The cuprous oxide acts as an semiconductor I guess? But It isn‘t doped, and the other electrode (copper) isn‘t even a semiconductor. I‘ve heard of Schottky diode solar cells, but even those require the semiconductor to be doped. So can someone please explain to me what exactly is going on here, and if there are other examples of this phenomenon.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Tom.G said:
The cuprous oxide is itself a semiconductor, one could say that the doping is the Oxygen.

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1939.0066
(found with: https://www.google.com/search?&q=copper+oxide+photocell)

Cheers,
Tom
p.s. Google is often useful, you can often learn more from a search than asking us to search.
Damn thank you. I had difficulties finding good explanations to the actual workings of copper solar cells.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top