How do evolutionists construct descendency trees from fossils?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Al-Layth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    fossils Trees
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Evolutionists construct descent trees from fossils using methods such as cladistics, which analyzes physical and molecular traits to determine relationships among species. The process involves examining skeletal models from fossil expeditions to identify distinct animals and their variations. While age determination of bones is crucial, it is insufficient alone, as multiple species can coexist. Current best practices emphasize the importance of both morphological and genetic data in constructing accurate phylogenetic trees.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cladistics and its application in evolutionary biology
  • Familiarity with fossil analysis and skeletal reconstruction techniques
  • Knowledge of phylogenetic trees and their significance in taxonomy
  • Basic concepts of molecular biology relevant to evolutionary studies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced cladistics methodologies and their applications in paleontology
  • Explore the use of molecular phylogenetics in determining evolutionary relationships
  • Study case examples of fossil analysis leading to significant discoveries in descent trees
  • Investigate the role of genetic data in modern evolutionary biology
USEFUL FOR

Students of evolutionary biology, paleontologists, and researchers interested in the methodologies for constructing phylogenetic trees from fossil evidence.

Al-Layth
Messages
21
Reaction score
4
Looking at the result of a great number of fossil expeditions, I understand how you can construct the full or partial skeletons of a number of different animals, you would be able to certainly identify certain bones as belonging to a distinct animal. That's great. you now know there were these very similair looking animals with slight variations and you have a collection of their skeletal models.

My problem is, how do you know which animal descended from which?
Determining the age of the bones cannot be enough because its possible multiple species existed at the same time.

And from what i've read, the anthropologists of the past have made many mistakes as regards to determining descendancy as well.

So what actually are the current best methods for determining the correct descendancy tree from a collection of animal skeleton you constructed from the discoveries from a number of fossil expeditions?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There several methods for doing this.
Cladistics is one of the better known methods.
It is a fairly large complex subject.
Here is a wikipedia article on cladistics you might want to read.
These methods can be used for physical traits as well as molecular traits and can be applied to current as well as extinct species.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bigfooted, atyy, Godot_ and 5 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
27K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K