How Do Forces Balance in a Spring-Mass System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter orange300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of a spring-mass system involving two masses, M1 and M2, connected by a spring with spring constant k. The forces exerted by the spring on each mass are described using Hooke's Law (F = -kx), where the equilibrium position is set at x = -3 and x = 3. The forum participants clarify that the center of mass experiences zero net force, and the concept of reduced mass simplifies the analysis into a single differential equation. The importance of accurately defining the coordinate system and understanding the forces at play is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and its application in spring systems
  • Familiarity with concepts of equilibrium and forces in mechanics
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their role in motion analysis
  • Basic principles of center of mass in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of reduced mass in spring-mass systems
  • Learn how to set up and solve differential equations for mechanical systems
  • Explore the effects of friction on motion in spring-mass systems
  • Review resources on equilibrium positions and force analysis in mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of spring-mass systems and force interactions.

orange300
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering about this problem (this is not a homework problem or anything like that), and I'm not sure that I know how to solve it:

Homework Statement


2 masses, M1 and M2, are connected in the middle by a spring (spring constant k). How would I describe the force exerted by the spring on each mass so that the force is zero at some pre-determined equilibrium, outward when the spring is compressed, and inward when the spring is stretched?

Homework Equations


F=-kx (Hooke's Law)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have thought about putting the center (zero) of my coordinate system at the center of the spring, but I am not sure if this is correct. In other words, the displacement x is defined by the distance of either end of the spring from the center of the spring (at x=0). I set the equilibrium displacement at x=-3 and x=3 (3 units to the left of the center and 3 units to the right, respectively). Thus, when the spring is compressed (x>-3 on the left side of the center position, and x<3 on the right side), the spring exerts an outward force on each mass (left (negative) on M1, right (positive) on M2), so the Hooke's Law expression for the force on M1 would be F1=-k(x+3) and the expression for the force on M2 would be F2=-k(x-3). Similarly, the spring would exert an inward force when stretched (x<-3 on the left side, x>3 on the right). When the ends of the spring are at x=-3 on the left and x=3 on the right, the force exerted by the spring on either mass is zero

Ultimately, I would like to apply a force to one of the masses (a leftward force to the left-most mass, M1), add friction to the surface upon which the masses slide, and describe the equations of motion for the system, but I would like to be sure if I'm on the right track. I suppose my biggest hang-up involves the assumption that each end of the spring (on either side of x=0) is the same, which seems like an oversimplification, and the fact that the forces exerted by the spring on each mass do not balance.

I'm sure it is just something simple that I'm overlooking, but any help that could be offered would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, welcome to PF. :smile:

The centre of mass of the system experiences zero force. It would be convenient to take that as the origin. All the other points on the spring experiences tensional or compressional force. After simplification, you'll end up with something called a reduced mass, where you have to solve a single differential equation, instead of two DEs for two masses.

I suppose my biggest hang-up involves the assumption that each end of the spring (on either side of x=0) is the same, which seems like an oversimplification, and the fact that the forces exerted by the spring on each mass do not balance.

You are right. This is a very well discussed and elementary problem. It is heartening to note that you have already found the problems in the way you have tried to formulate it. Keep it up. Read up on this. For example, http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/336k/lectures/node63.html and http://math.fullerton.edu/mathews/n2003/SpringMassMod.html .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K