MHB How do I calculate the Jacobian for a convolution?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the Jacobian for the transformation t=τ+p, the correct approach involves recognizing that τ is independent of p. The Jacobian is given by the determinant of the matrix formed by the partial derivatives, resulting in a value of -1. This contrasts with the initial assumption that the Jacobian would equal -2, which was incorrect. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly identifying independent variables in transformations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate calculations in convolution.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hello! :o

Having the transformation t=τ+p, I want to calculate the jacobian $\frac{J(t,τ)}{J(τ,p)}$.
Isn't it $$ \frac{J(t,τ)}{J(τ,p)}=\begin{vmatrix}
\frac{ \vartheta t}{\vartheta τ}& \frac{\vartheta t}{\vartheta p} \\
\frac{\vartheta τ}{\vartheta τ} & \frac{\varthetaτ }{\vartheta p}
\end{vmatrix}=\begin{vmatrix}
1& 1 \\
1 & -1
\end{vmatrix}=-1-1=-2$$? But the absolute value of the Jacobian for the convolution is $1$..What did I wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The transformation you actually have is this:

$$
\begin{cases}
t = \tau + p, \\
\tau = \tau.
\end{cases}
$$

Seems tautological? Yes, but it's the same way you do cylindrical coordinates:

$$
\begin{cases}
x = r \cos \theta, \\
y = r \sin \theta, \\
z = z.
\end{cases}
$$

We see that $\tau$ is independent of $p$. Therefore your Jacobian is

$$
\frac{\partial (t, \tau)}{\partial (\tau, p)}
=
\begin{vmatrix}
\frac{\partial t}{\partial \tau} & \frac{\partial t}{\partial p} \\
\frac{\partial \tau}{\partial \tau} & \frac{\partial \tau}{\partial p}
\end{vmatrix}
=
\begin{vmatrix}
1 & 1 \\
1 & 0
\end{vmatrix}
= -1.
$$
 
Fantini said:
The transformation you actually have is this:

$$
\begin{cases}
t = \tau + p, \\
\tau = \tau.
\end{cases}
$$

Seems tautological? Yes, but it's the same way you do cylindrical coordinates:

$$
\begin{cases}
x = r \cos \theta, \\
y = r \sin \theta, \\
z = z.
\end{cases}
$$

We see that $\tau$ is independent of $p$. Therefore your Jacobian is

$$
\frac{\partial (t, \tau)}{\partial (\tau, p)}
=
\begin{vmatrix}
\frac{\partial t}{\partial \tau} & \frac{\partial t}{\partial p} \\
\frac{\partial \tau}{\partial \tau} & \frac{\partial \tau}{\partial p}
\end{vmatrix}
=
\begin{vmatrix}
1 & 1 \\
1 & 0
\end{vmatrix}
= -1.
$$

Ok! Thanks for your help! (Yes)
 
I'm glad to help. If you encounter more difficulties or didn't understand what I meant, please ask! :)
 
Fantini said:
I'm glad to help. If you encounter more difficulties or didn't understand what I meant, please ask! :)

Ok! :D
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top