How Do I Calculate Time as a Function of Distance for Two Electrons in a Vacuum?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rebeka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time as a function of distance for two electrons in a vacuum, starting from their initial conditions and considering their mutual electrostatic interaction. Participants explore various approaches to derive this relationship, including energy conservation and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in deriving time as a function of distance for two electrons, indicating a lack of clarity in their mathematical approach.
  • Another participant suggests using energy conservation principles, providing a formula that relates time to distance through potential energy and kinetic energy considerations.
  • A third participant acknowledges the correctness of the previous response and proposes a solution from first principles, detailing the integration of acceleration and velocity.
  • This participant introduces a common physics trick involving the relationship between velocity and distance, leading to an integral that connects these quantities.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the insights shared, reflecting on their previous struggles with the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single method for solving the problem, as multiple approaches are discussed, and there is no definitive resolution to the initial question posed.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on various assumptions about the system, such as the nature of the forces involved and the initial conditions of the electrons. The discussion highlights the complexity of integrating motion equations in the context of electrostatic forces.

rebeka
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Five years ago I posted this question. At the time it was difficult for me to understand almost all of what I was trying to learn and was very frustrated. I put it down and studied other stuff including math. I just looked at this question again and am finding myself still unable to derive any answers.

I'm having some trouble with a pretty basic question and I'm not sure what I'm missing that will correct my thinking. If I have two electrons in a vacuum and they are set at arbitrary origins at a correspondingly arbitrary fixed distance between them with initial velocity 0 how do I find time as a function of distance?

I'm looking at this like so:
a(r) = k_{e} \frac{q^{2}}{m \cdot r^{2}}

where a is acceleration, r is the distance between the two electrons, k_{e} is the Coulomb Constant, m is two times the electron mass and q is the charge on one electron. Both electrons are allowed to move freely!

I feel that plotting acceleration as a function of distance would be useful but I'm not seeing how to integrate in time? What am I missing about the mathematics which is also probably rather elementary and is preventing me from logically thinking this through?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For these kind of problems, you use the energy conservation.
E=\frac{1}{2}m\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^{2} + V(x) \ \ \rightarrow \ \ \frac{dx}{dt} = \pm \sqrt{2[E-V(x)]/m}
\rightarrow \ \ dt=\pm \frac{dx}{\sqrt{2[E-V(x)]/m}}

\pm in the expression is determined by the initial condition of the problem. (for example, whether they approaching or moving away from each other?)
 
Thank you for redirecting my approach!
 
While weejee is absolutely correct in everything he did, We can solve this problem
from first principles, just the way you asked. [and it includes a common physics-trick,
which is probably good to see used.] The energy is sometimes called a FIRST INTEGRAL
of the motion. meaning we get it when we integrate the equations of motion 1 time.

start from a = (kq^2)/(mr^2)
recognize a = dv/dt = d^2r/dt^2
[the trick]
\frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{dv}{dr}\frac{dr}{dt} = v \frac{dv}{dr}

So that
v\frac{dv}{dr} = \frac{k q^2}{m r^2}
or
\int_{v_0}^v v dv = \frac{k q^2}{m} \int_{r_0}^r r^{-2} dr
or
\frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{v_0^2}{2} = \frac{k q^2}{m} <br /> \left( \frac{1}{r_0} - \frac{1}{r} \right)

Now this can be rearranged a-la weejee.

---
of course, we really wouldn't want to do this integral from scratch everytime
for each different force F that we run into. If the force is conservative (i.e. the
gradient of some potential) we can do this one time to arive at the law of
conservation of energy -- and from then on just use conservation of energy.
 
That's awesome ... I wish I had come up with this myself with all the time I spent trying to figure it out ... but I'm glad to get it out of my head, it's been stuck there for a while. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K