MHB How do I convert from this mod number to a regular number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SigmaS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert Regular
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around converting the expression $(\frac{1}{4900})^{100}$ into a regular number using modular arithmetic. The user initially simplifies $4900$ to $84 \ (\text{mod 112})$ and seeks to express the result in standard form. There is confusion regarding the application of modular arithmetic and the relevance of the modulus $112$. Alternative methods are suggested, including approximating the expression using logarithms, which leads to a more straightforward calculation. The conversation highlights the challenges of modular arithmetic in practical calculations and suggests logarithmic approaches as a viable alternative.
SigmaS
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
So I was working on solving $(\frac{1}{4900})^{100}$, and I figured the only way to do this neatly is through modular arithmetic.

I found that $4900 \equiv 84 \ (\text {mod 112})$, so I concluded $$\frac{1^{100}}{84^{10}\times84^{10} \ (\text{mod 112})}$$

Which should equal $$\frac{1}{3.06\times10^{38} \ (\text{mod 112})}$$

Now, this is still in mod form. How do I convert that value to a regular number, by mostly hand? When I tried converting it with the equation $n=qm+r$ where n is the number we wish to convert to, q is our quotient, m is the mod we're using, and r is the remainder; solving for n I got 84, but that doesn't sound right at all.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi SigmaS,

What are you 'solving' exactly?
Are you trying to calculate $(4900^{-1})^{100}\pmod{112}$?
Or something else? If something else, where is the $112$ coming from?
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Hi SigmaS,

What are you 'solving' exactly?
Are you trying to calculate $(4900^{-1})^{100}\pmod{112}$?
Or something else? If something else, where is the $112$ coming from?

The 112 was just arbitrarily determined. I wanted to make $4900^{100}$ easy to calculate by hand. And I'm just trying to solve the probability of the problem, but expressed in much simpler terms.

if there's a better way to solve the original problem without modular arithmetic, then that would be great
 
How about:
$$4900^{100}\approx (\frac 12\cdot 10^4)^{100}=\frac 1{(2^{10})^{10}}\cdot 10^{400}
=\frac 1{(1024)^{10}}\cdot 10^{400}\approx \frac 1{10^{30}}\cdot 10^{400}=1\cdot10^{370}$$
? (Wondering)
 
Sixty years ago, this would have been an easy exercise in logarithms. $\log49 \approx 1.690196$, so $\log4900 \approx 3.690196$, and $\log(4900^{100}) \approx 369.0196$. Now take the antilog, to get $4900^{100}\approx 1.046\times 10^{369}.$
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K