How Do I Convert Units for the Force of Lift Equation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of units in the Force of Lift equation, specifically how to derive the lift force in pounds-force (lbf) from given parameters. Participants explore different methods for unit conversion, including switching between SI and US customary units, and address the implications of using various density units.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the Force of Lift equation and expresses confusion over unit conversions, specifically aiming for lbf.
  • Another participant suggests converting all units to SI first to avoid confusion, then converting back to US units, while also noting that density should be in slugs rather than pounds mass.
  • A later reply emphasizes that while SI units may simplify calculations, converting to SI does not eliminate the need to consider mass and acceleration in the context of force.
  • One participant mentions a conversation with their engineering teacher, leading to a reworked equation for lift force, resulting in a calculated lift force of 0.8084 lbf, questioning its reasonableness given the weight of the aircraft.
  • Another participant points out a potential error in the density units and questions the validity of the speed used in the calculations, suggesting it seems high for the weight of the aircraft.
  • A participant discusses energy calculations related to the aircraft's propulsion, converting energy units and deriving a horizontal velocity that aligns with the lift force calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to unit conversion, with some advocating for SI units while others prefer working directly with US units. There is no consensus on the reasonableness of the calculated lift force or the accuracy of the speed used in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the correct units for density and the appropriateness of the speed value used in the calculations. The discussion reflects a mix of exploratory reasoning and technical challenges related to unit conversions in fluid dynamics.

aaronmorg
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am stumped on how to convert my units for the equation for Force of Lift.

FL=CLPA\frac{v^{2}}{2}
My equation comes out to:

FL=(.76764)(.076\frac{lbm}{ft})(\frac{(65.899\frac{ft}{s})^{2}}{2})

Still figuring out this equation hypertext stuff. Please help if you can.

I am supposed to get lbf from all this. I think.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two things you can do in a situation like this:

1) First convert all of the units to SI units and rework the equation. There is no confusion on units in the SI system. Then when you are done, convert back over to US units.

2) Look at the density term. The standard units for density in our system is slugs, not pounds mass. That will give you
\frac{sl*ft}{s^2} which is Lbf

or just multiply your answer by 32.2 and trust that the units turn out right (which they do)

This may help:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound-force
 
...and that's slugs per cubic foot!
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah. Look at that.

What Russ said...
 
Thanks :D

I'll go try converting to metric units and I'll let you know how everything turns out!

I appreciate the help.
 
FredGarvin said:
1) First convert all of the units to SI units and rework the equation. There is no confusion on units in the SI system. Then when you are done, convert back over to US units.
Since you're going with this method, just a little comment: Though the units of SI are easier to work with, converting to SI does not eliminate the problem (the need to convert from mass and acceleration to force via f=ma).

So you could save yourself two steps by learning to work with slugs and lbf...

This is probably a good idea, too, since in the aero classes I took, the preferred units were English. You'll need to be proficient in them.
 
I admit it's not the most efficient way of doing things but it can be a good sanity check since it eliminates the confusion with mass units which is easy. If you have the time, work the SI units and then go back and rework the english units until the answers match. You should only have to do it a few times before it sinks in.
 
I talked to my engineering teacher and he said I was going about it the wrong way.

I need, at least, 50% Lift. So I reworked my equation and came out with

FL=\frac{(.76764)(.076\frac{lbm}{ft^2})(56.55 in^2)(\frac{47.67\frac{ft}{s}^2}{2})[\frac{ft^2}{144 in^2}]}{[32.2\frac{lbm-ft}{lbf-s^2}]}

I come out with .8084 lbf as Lift Force.

With my plane only weighing 27.999g (.0617lbm), is this a reasonable answer? It seems excessive...
 
You did mess up (typing at least) the units for density. Pounds-mass per cubic foot. Also, are you sure about the speed really being 48 ft/sec? 33 mph seems kind of fast for a 28 g aircraft.
 
  • #10
It seemed right because I calculated 26.14 in-lbf as the energy delivered by the Rubberband.

I converted 26.14 in-lbf to 2.1783 ft-lbf by dividing by 12.

Horizontal Velocity:

VH=\sqrt{(\frac{2(2.1783)ft-lbf}{27.999g})[\frac{453.6g}{1lbm}][32.2\frac{lbm-ft}{lbf-s2}]}

Comes out to 47.67 ft/s.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
23K