How do I correctly find the Christoffel symbol for a specific component?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jordy1113
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Christoffel Symbol
jordy1113
Messages
12
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Find Christoffel symbol
Relevant Equations
$$
\Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} g^{lj} (\partial_k g_{ij} + \partial_i g_{jk} - \partial_j g_{ki})
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
g_{00}(x,t)=1\\
g_{0i}(x,t)=0\\
g_{ij}(x,t)=a^{2}(t)[\delta_{ij}+h_{ij}(x,t)]\\
\end{eqnarray}
I was not given a formal teaching on christoffel symbols and how to find them so I just need some help.
I'm trying to find the cristoffel symbol:
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^{i}_{00}
\end{equation}
I set my equation up as:
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^i_{00} = \frac{1}{2} g^{ij} (\partial_0 g_{0j} + \partial_0 g_{0j} - \partial_j g_{00})
\end{equation}
Am I correct in getting that this christoffel symbol is equal to zero? If not what am I doing wrong? Many thanks in advance (sorry I am still trying to figure out the latex on the forum)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From (5) you seem to be right. Why do not you calculate general jk components not only 00 ?
If not all components are zero, you would have some confidence.
 
You're right, but what kind of metric is this?
 
haushofer said:
You're right, but what kind of metric is this?
cosmological synchronous gauge according to Dodelson and Schmidt
 
anuttarasammyak said:
From (5) you seem to be right. Why do not you calculate general jk components not only 00 ?
If not all components are zero, you would have some confidence.
thanks, I calculated some of the other christoffel symbols already and my professor checked them, we just forgot to do this one so I needed some reassurance I was doing it correctly
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top