How do i find quantities in fusion formulae

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating energy yields from the fusion of carbon isotopes, specifically the reaction *C^12+C^12-->Mg^24+y(+13.93 MeV)*. The energy of 13.93 MeV is released when two C-12 atoms fuse to form one Mg-24 atom. To determine the energy yield for a specific quantity of carbon, one must calculate the number of C-12 nuclei from the mass of carbon, use branching ratios for possible reactions, and apply the formula N/2*(f1Q1 + f2Q2 + ... + fiQi) to estimate total energy output. Accurate calculations are hindered by the complex conditions under which carbon fusion occurs in stars.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear fusion processes
  • Familiarity with isotopes, specifically Carbon-12 and Magnesium-24
  • Knowledge of energy units, particularly MeV (mega-electronvolts)
  • Basic skills in mathematical modeling and calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of branching ratios in nuclear reactions
  • Study the energy release mechanisms in stellar fusion processes
  • Learn about the conditions required for carbon fusion in stars
  • Explore mathematical modeling techniques for nuclear reactions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, nuclear physicists, and students studying astrophysics or nuclear chemistry who are interested in the processes of stellar fusion and energy calculations.

littleinstien
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
in the equation *C^12+C^12-->Mg^24+y(+13.93 MeV)* for what quantity is the energy assigned? and how would i plug in a certain amount of carbon?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If I understand your question correctly, the energy given is for two atoms of C12 combining to form one atom of Mg24. If you want to plug in an amount of carbon, count the atoms in the quantity.
 
The 13.93 MeV would be difference mass of the 2 C-12's and the Mg-24, and would be given off as a gamma ray for each nuclear reaction. Since it is based on 2 carbons, one would use the number of carbon atoms in half the carbon mass to determine a total energy yield.

The reaction is more likely when the carbon nuclei are traveling head on at each other.]

Keep in mind that other reactions are also possible, and perhaps more likely.

http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com/topics/stars/FusionCarbonOxygen.html

http://www.astro.cornell.edu/academics/courses/astro201/carbon_fusion.htm

http://physics.uoregon.edu/~jimbrau/astr122/Notes/ch20/carbon.html
 
Last edited:
thanks, but how then would i accurately find energy out come for a specific quantity?
 
littleinstien said:
thanks, but how then would i accurately find energy out come for a specific quantity?
A specific quantity of carbon?

Well, one would have to know the branching ratios (or yield fractions) of the possible reactions, i.e. the fraction of 12C + 12C reactions that result in each of several products, and how much energy is produced for each reaction.

Then it's a matter of taking the mass of 12C, determining the number of 12C nuclei, divide that by half because 1 C-C fusion uses two nuclei, and multipy by the yield fraction and energy per reactions.

So the total energy would be N/2*(f1Q1 + f2Q2 + . . . + fiQi) where fi is the yield fraction of reaction i, and Qi is the energy release per reaction i.

The number of atoms (nuclei) is just the mass (kg)*/(atom mass in amu *1.66E-27 kg/amu).

It's not really possible to get an 'accurate' answer because carbon fusion occurs under rather complicated circumstances that we cannot reproduce experimentally on Earth. We can produce 50 keV carbon ions, but they will not be +12 ions, and the target will not be ionized either, so one would have to go to higher energies. However, we cannot reproduce densities found in heavy stars (2 x 108 kg/m3). So the best we can do is approximate with models of stars.
 
Hello, I am designing an X-ray irradiator with MCNP simulation. But I am still in confusion, whether my X-ray housing will be a box or a cylinder. If the box (macrobody identifier of MCNP) is required, I am trying to match the dimension as that of the cylinder, i,e, the height will be that of the cylinder height, and the other two dimensions will be that of the radius of the cylinder (surface 52 and 53). Can anybody please help me define the surfaces? Below is my attached text file. Forgot...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K