okkvlt
- 53
- 0
a derivation of the formula for arc length is simple enough:
given a function f[x], find the length of the arc from x0 to x1.
lim(x1-x0)/n=dx
n->inf
x1
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum\sqrt{(x+(i+1)dx-(x+idx))^2+f(x+(i+1)dx)-f(x+dx))^2}
xo
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum\sqrt{(dx)^2+f(x+(i+1)dx)-f(x+idx))^2}
by the definition of the derivative, f(x+(i+1)dx)-f(x+idx)=f'(x+idx)*dx
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum\sqrt{dx^2+(f'(x+idx)*dx)^2}
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum dx*\sqrt{1+f'(x+idx)^2}
and by the definition of the integral
^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum dx*\sqrt{1+f'(x+idx)^2}=\int\sqrt{1+f'(x)^2}dx
(the first equation uses the pythagorean theorem to estimate the length of the curve from x+idx,f(x+idx) to x+(i+1)dx,f(x+(i+1)dx).
now here's where it gets messed up. suppose i want to find the surface area of the function f[x,y] by the same technique.
i have a square,
D_______C
|...|
|...|
|_______|
A...B
A=x+idx,y+jdy
B=x+(i+1)dx,y+jdy
C=x+(i+1)dx,y+(j+1)dy
D=x+idx,y+(j+1)dy
where
lim(x1-x0)/nx=dx
nx->inf
lim(y1-y0)/ny=dy
ny->inf
anyway, to avoid a long drawn out thing that arrives to the wrong conclusion, i multiplied the distance A,f(A) to B,f(B) by the distance A,f(A) to D,f(D) and i came up with the integrand being
\sqrt{1+(\partial f/\partial x)^2+(\partial f/\partial y)^2+(\partial f/\partial y)(\partial f/\partial x)}
which is wrong. How do i use the same method of finding the arc length formula to find the surface area formula?
given a function f[x], find the length of the arc from x0 to x1.
lim(x1-x0)/n=dx
n->inf
x1
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum\sqrt{(x+(i+1)dx-(x+idx))^2+f(x+(i+1)dx)-f(x+dx))^2}
xo
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum\sqrt{(dx)^2+f(x+(i+1)dx)-f(x+idx))^2}
by the definition of the derivative, f(x+(i+1)dx)-f(x+idx)=f'(x+idx)*dx
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum\sqrt{dx^2+(f'(x+idx)*dx)^2}
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum dx*\sqrt{1+f'(x+idx)^2}
and by the definition of the integral
^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum dx*\sqrt{1+f'(x+idx)^2}=\int\sqrt{1+f'(x)^2}dx
(the first equation uses the pythagorean theorem to estimate the length of the curve from x+idx,f(x+idx) to x+(i+1)dx,f(x+(i+1)dx).
now here's where it gets messed up. suppose i want to find the surface area of the function f[x,y] by the same technique.
i have a square,
D_______C
|...|
|...|
|_______|
A...B
A=x+idx,y+jdy
B=x+(i+1)dx,y+jdy
C=x+(i+1)dx,y+(j+1)dy
D=x+idx,y+(j+1)dy
where
lim(x1-x0)/nx=dx
nx->inf
lim(y1-y0)/ny=dy
ny->inf
anyway, to avoid a long drawn out thing that arrives to the wrong conclusion, i multiplied the distance A,f(A) to B,f(B) by the distance A,f(A) to D,f(D) and i came up with the integrand being
\sqrt{1+(\partial f/\partial x)^2+(\partial f/\partial y)^2+(\partial f/\partial y)(\partial f/\partial x)}
which is wrong. How do i use the same method of finding the arc length formula to find the surface area formula?