How do i generalize this result to higher dimensions? (arc length, surface area)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the formula for surface area from the arc length formula using multivariable calculus. The arc length is calculated using the integral of the square root of the sum of the squares of the derivatives, leading to the formula S = ∫√(1 + (f'(x))²)dx. The user attempts to extend this method to find the surface area of a function f[x,y] but encounters an error in their integrand formulation. The correct approach involves using the expression √(1 + (∂f/∂x)² + (∂f/∂y)²) for surface area, which is essential for accurate calculations in higher dimensions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of derivatives and partial derivatives
  • Experience with mathematical notation and limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the surface area formula for functions of two variables
  • Learn about surface integrals in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the application of the Pythagorean theorem in calculus
  • Review examples of arc length and surface area calculations in textbooks or online resources
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and its applications in higher dimensions, as well as educators teaching multivariable calculus concepts.

okkvlt
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
a derivation of the formula for arc length is simple enough:
given a function f[x], find the length of the arc from x0 to x1.

lim(x1-x0)/n=dx
n->inf

x1
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum\sqrt{(x+(i+1)dx-(x+idx))^2+f(x+(i+1)dx)-f(x+dx))^2}
xo
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum\sqrt{(dx)^2+f(x+(i+1)dx)-f(x+idx))^2}
by the definition of the derivative, f(x+(i+1)dx)-f(x+idx)=f'(x+idx)*dx
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum\sqrt{dx^2+(f'(x+idx)*dx)^2}
S=^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum dx*\sqrt{1+f'(x+idx)^2}
and by the definition of the integral
^{i=n-1}_{i=0}\sum dx*\sqrt{1+f'(x+idx)^2}=\int\sqrt{1+f'(x)^2}dx

(the first equation uses the pythagorean theorem to estimate the length of the curve from x+idx,f(x+idx) to x+(i+1)dx,f(x+(i+1)dx).
now here's where it gets messed up. suppose i want to find the surface area of the function f[x,y] by the same technique.
i have a square,

D_______C
|...|
|...|
|_______|
A...B

A=x+idx,y+jdy
B=x+(i+1)dx,y+jdy
C=x+(i+1)dx,y+(j+1)dy
D=x+idx,y+(j+1)dy
where
lim(x1-x0)/nx=dx
nx->inf
lim(y1-y0)/ny=dy
ny->inf

anyway, to avoid a long drawn out thing that arrives to the wrong conclusion, i multiplied the distance A,f(A) to B,f(B) by the distance A,f(A) to D,f(D) and i came up with the integrand being
\sqrt{1+(\partial f/\partial x)^2+(\partial f/\partial y)^2+(\partial f/\partial y)(\partial f/\partial x)}

which is wrong. How do i use the same method of finding the arc length formula to find the surface area formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K