How Do I Normalize a Quantum Mechanics Equation With an Integral?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marthius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffeq
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of a quantum mechanics equation represented by the function P(x) = Ae^{-\lambda(x-a)^{2}}. Participants explore the mathematical challenges associated with integrating the function and the implications for normalization, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in normalizing the function due to a lack of experience with differential equations and the integral involved.
  • Another participant provides a formula for the integral, indicating that it cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions and introduces the error function (erf).
  • A participant questions how to proceed with normalization given the presence of the error function and the absence of numerical values.
  • It is noted that only the definite integral is needed for normalization, and participants suggest consulting integral tables found in quantum mechanics textbooks.
  • One participant asserts that the integral from a to infinity can be calculated and provides a specific result, linking it to the error function.
  • Another participant confirms the correctness of the integral result and clarifies a notation error regarding the variable of integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the normalization process and the role of the error function. There is no consensus on the best approach to take, and some participants remain confused about the implications of the integral results.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the participants' varying levels of familiarity with special functions and the specific definitions of normalization in the context of quantum mechanics.

Marthius
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I am starting to teach myself quantum mech. in preperation for this coming semester, however i have hit a mathamatical road block. I need to normalize the folowing equation.

[tex]P(x)=Ae^{-\lambda(x-a)^{2}}[/tex]

unfortunately I do not take DiffEQ until this coming semester and I don't know how to take the following integral.

[tex]\int e^{-\lambda(x-a)^{2}}[/tex]

Any help would be greatly appreciated (yes, I know that i should have taken DiffEQ before this...).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marthius said:
I am starting to teach myself quantum mech. in preperation for this coming semester, however i have hit a mathamatical road block. I need to normalize the folowing equation.

[tex]P(x)=Ae^{-\lambda(x-a)^{2}}[/tex]

unfortunately I do not take DiffEQ until this coming semester and I don't know how to take the following integral.

[tex]\int e^{-\lambda(x-a)^{2}}[/tex]

Any help would be greatly appreciated (yes, I know that i should have taken DiffEQ before this...).

You may not like my answer: That integral is
[tex]\frac{A\sqrt{\pi}}{2}erf(x-a)+ C[/tex]
where "erf(x)" is the error function. It is defined by
[tex]erf(x)= \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_0^x e^{-x^2}dx[/tex]

You have to understand that most integrable functions (in a technical sense "almost all integrable functions") cannot be integrated in terms of "elementary" functions- the kind that you learn about in basic algebra or calculus courses. That integral, which is used extensively in probability and statistics calculations is one such.
 
Thanks for the answer, unfortunately now i am more confused then ever. Given that as the integral of the function, how do i go about normalizing the function with A. Should i be ignoring the error function since no numerical values were given in the problem?
 
That indefinite integral is impossible to calculate in terms of elementary functions. However, since you're normalizing a wavefunction, you don't need the indefinite integral, but only the definite. I assume that at least one of your limits is infinity...

Like somebody else said... The mathematically rigorous way of going about it is to look into the error function. If you don't have too much experience with special functions, then there is an easy fix: Look at a table of integrals in the back of your quantum book! Virtually all quantum mechanics books have a short table of definite/indefinite integrals. Your integral should be in there in one form or another... You will more than likely need to use an elementary substitution.
 
Well, what do YOU mean by "normalizing" a function? While that anti-derivative cannot be done in "closed form" it turns out to be relatively easy to show that
[tex]\int_a^\infty e^{-\lambda(x-a)^2}dz= \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2\lambda}[/tex]
That was the reason for the "[itex]2/\sqrt{\pi}[/itex]" in the definition of erf(x). If I understand what you mean by "normalization" correctly, [itex]erf(x- a)/\lambda[/itex] is the normalization of your function.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Well, what do YOU mean by "normalizing" a function? While that anti-derivative cannot be done in "closed form" it turns out to be relatively easy to show that
[tex]\int_a^\infty e^{-\lambda(x-a)^2}dz= \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2\lambda}[/tex]
That was the reason for the "[itex]2/\sqrt{\pi}[/itex]" in the definition of erf(x). If I understand what you mean by "normalization" correctly, [itex]erf(x- a)/\lambda[/itex] is the normalization of your function.

As it turns out, since I last posted this problem i have been able to solve my question. What you said here is exactly what I mean (withought realizing it). Thanks for the help.
 
would I be correct in saying

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-\lambda(x-a)^2}dz= \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{\sqrt{\lambda}}[/tex]
 
Yep, that's what you should get. Do you mean dz or dx?
 
slider142 said:
Yep, that's what you should get. Do you mean dz or dx?

i meant dx, z was just the substitution var I used, was an accident.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
420
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K