Is interchanging the order of the surface and volume integrals valid here?

In summary, the order of integration does not affect the result of the surface and volume integrals of charge density on a closed surface.
  • #1
Beelzedad
24
3
Consider a continuous charge distribution in volume ##V'##. Draw a closed surface ##S## inside the volume ##V'##.

br.png


Consider the following multiple integral:

##\displaystyle A=\iiint_{V'} \left[ \iint_S \dfrac{\cos(\hat{R},\hat{n})}{R^2} dS \right] \rho'\ dV' =4 \pi\ m_s##

where

##R=|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}|##

##\mathbf{r'}=(x',y',z')## is coordinates of source points

##\mathbf{r}=(x,y,z)## is coordinates of field points

##\cos(\hat{R},\hat{n})## is the angle between ##R## and normal to surface element

##\rho'## is the charge density and is continuous throughout the volume ##V'##

##m_s## is the total charge inside surface ##S##
______________________________________________________________________________________

Also consider the following multiple integral:

##\displaystyle B= \iint_S \left[ \iiint_{V'} \dfrac{\cos(\hat{R},\hat{n})}{R^2} \rho'\ dV' \right] dS##

where the symbols have the meanings stated above.

\begin{align}
B &= \iint_S \left[ \iiint_{V'} \rho' \dfrac{\hat{R} \cdot \hat{n}}{R^2} \ dV' \right] dS\\
&=\iint_S \left[ \iiint_{V'} \rho' \dfrac{\hat{R} }{R^2} \ dV' \right] \cdot \hat{n}\ dS\\
&=\iint_S \mathbf{E} \cdot \hat{n}\ dS
\end{align}
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Is ##A=B\ ?##

i.e. Is interchanging the order of surface and volume integration valid? I know it is usually valid but my doubt is due to the following reasons:

1. In the surface integral of equation ##A##, when ##\mathbf{r'} \in S##, we can only use spherical coordinate system with origin at point ##\mathbf{r'}## (in order to avoid improper integral with limits). So while computing ##A##, we cannot use only one coordinate system. Instead, we have to use infinitely many coordinate systems.
2. In the volume integral of equation ##B##, for all ##\mathbf{r}##, i.e. for all ##\mathbf{r} \in S##, we can only use spherical coordinate system with origin at point ##\mathbf{r}## (in order to avoid improper integral with limits). So while computing ##B##, we cannot use only one coordinate system. Instead, we have to use infinitely many coordinate systems.

Note:

I know ##\int \left[\int f(x,y)\,dx \right]dy = \int \left[\int f(x,y)\,dy \right]dx## is true usually. Also, if in the diagram, if the volume ##V'## is contained within the surface ##S##, then it is valid to change the order of integration. But here the issue is a little different. The surface ##S## is inside the volume ##V'## (please have a look at my diagram) and thus improper integral comes into play.

While computing ##A##, if we need to avoid improper integrals, we have no choice except to work with infinitely many spherical coordinate systems each having their origin at points ##\in V'##.

Similarly while computing ##B##, if we need to avoid improper integrals, we have no choice except to work with infinitely many spherical coordinate systems each having their origin at points ##\in S##.

Then how is it valid to change the order of integration in this situation? That is, how can ##A=B?##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi.

I have a question about the case. As for A, m_s is expressed as
[tex]\int_{V'} \rho' dV' = m_s[/tex]
thus if your equation holds,
[tex]\int_S \frac{cos(\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{n})}{R^2}dS=4\pi[/tex]
I am afraid LHS integral is zero for the field source point outside S. Is it always enclosed by S?
Here I did not used symbols ##\int\int## and ##\int\int\int## to express surface and volume integral as you do. Instead I wrote a single integral.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
mitochan said:
Hi.

I have a question about the case. As for A, m_s is expressed as
[tex]\int_{V'} \rho' dV' = m_s[/tex]
thus if your equation holds,
[tex]\int_S \frac{cos(\mathbf{R}\cdot\mathbf{n})}{R^2}dS=4\pi[/tex]
I am afraid LHS integral is zero for the field source point outside S. Is it always enclosed by S?
Here I did not used symbols ##\int\int## and ##\int\int\int## to express surface and volume integral as you do. Instead I wrote a single integral.

I really apologize for not being able to mention it. It seemed to me to be too obvious for you.

Let ##U'## denote the volume enclosed by surface ##S##. Then:

##\displaystyle \iiint_{U'} \rho' dU' = m_s \tag1##

For field point inside ##S##:

##\displaystyle \iint_S \dfrac{\cos(\hat{R},\hat{n})}{R^2} dS=4 \pi \tag2##

For field point on ##S##:

##\displaystyle 0<\iint_S \dfrac{\cos(\hat{R},\hat{n})}{R^2} dS<4 \pi \tag3##

For field point outside ##S##:

##\displaystyle \iint_S \dfrac{\cos(\hat{R},\hat{n})}{R^2} dS=0 \tag4##

And lastly, the volume integral over ##V'## of these (surface integrals) is given by ##A##. My book has a bit lengthy derivation of it (##3##-##4## pages). It may not be needed in answering this question. My question is only about the interchanging of order of surface and volume integrals in this situation. But if you really need the ##3##-##4## pages derivation, it will take me some time to type it down.
 
  • #4
Thanks for explanation. The integral

[tex]\int_{S}\int_{V'}[\ \rho(r')\frac{\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}|^3}\ ]\cdot d\mathbf{S}\ dV'[/tex]
where integration parameters r is on S and r' is in V', are interpreted as for orders "first prime then no-prime"

[tex]\int_{S}[\ \int_{V'}[\ \rho(r')\frac{\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}|^3}\ ]dV' \ ]\cdot d\mathbf{S}[/tex]
which means "Find electric field generated from all the charges in V' working on a point of surface S first and then integrate their projection on S" , and "first no-prime then prime"
[tex]\int_{V'}[\ \int_{S}[\ \rho(r')\frac{\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r'}|^3}\ ]\cdot d\mathbf{S}\ ] \ dV' [/tex]
which means "Find electric field contribution of a charge projected on all over the surface S , then integrate it for all the charges in V'". The both meet.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the purpose of interchanging the order of surface and volume integrals?

The purpose of interchanging the order of surface and volume integrals is to simplify the calculation process and potentially make it more efficient. This can be particularly useful when dealing with complex mathematical equations or when solving problems in physics or engineering.

2. Under what conditions is it valid to interchange the order of surface and volume integrals?

Interchanging the order of surface and volume integrals is valid when the integrand is continuous and the integration limits are finite. Additionally, the region of integration must be well-defined and the integrals must converge.

3. What are the potential consequences of interchanging the order of surface and volume integrals incorrectly?

If the order of surface and volume integrals is interchanged incorrectly, it can lead to incorrect results and potentially affect the accuracy of the overall calculation. This can be problematic in scientific research, where accuracy and precision are crucial.

4. Are there any special cases where interchanging the order of surface and volume integrals is not valid?

Yes, there are special cases where interchanging the order of surface and volume integrals is not valid. One example is when the integrand is discontinuous or when the integration limits are infinite. In these cases, special techniques must be used to correctly evaluate the integral.

5. How can one determine if interchanging the order of surface and volume integrals is valid for a specific problem?

To determine if interchanging the order of surface and volume integrals is valid for a specific problem, one can use mathematical theorems such as Fubini's theorem or Tonelli's theorem. These theorems provide conditions under which the order of integration can be changed. Additionally, consulting with a mathematician or using numerical methods can also help determine the validity of interchanging the order of integrals.

Similar threads

  • Calculus
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
318
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
620
Back
Top