Obtain Normal Vector of Bubble Wall in Spacetime

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the normal vector of a bubble wall in a spacetime described by the metric $$ds^2 = -dt^2 + a(t) ( dr^2 + r^2 d\Omega^2_2)$$. The participants explore the implications of assuming a time-like trajectory for the bubble wall and reference a related paper that computes the norm for a different metric. They clarify that the parameters R and T represent coordinates on the bubble wall as functions of proper time, indicating a one-parameter family of surfaces. The normal vector is expected to include a time derivative component, specifically #\dot{T}#.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and spacetime metrics
  • Familiarity with bubble dynamics in cosmological models
  • Knowledge of normal vectors in differential geometry
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation, particularly in tensor calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of normal vectors in general relativity, focusing on time-like surfaces
  • Examine the paper referenced (arXiv:hep-ph/0003173) for insights on bubble wall norms
  • Learn about the implications of dynamical solutions in cosmological models
  • Explore the mathematical framework of one-parameter families of surfaces in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and mathematicians interested in the dynamics of bubble walls in spacetime and the application of differential geometry in general relativity.

John Greger
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Want to compute the normal vector of a bubble wall embedded in a spacetime with metric.
So say I have a bubble embedded in a spacetime with metric:
$$ds^2 = -dt^2 + a(t) ( dr^2 + r^2 d\Omega^2_2) $$

how do I compute the normal vector if I assume the wall of the bubble the metric represents follows a time-like trajectory, for any ##a(t)##?

Since we are interested in dynamical solutions, we let the positions on the brane be ##(t,r, \theta, \phi) \rightarrow (T(\tau), R(\tau), \theta, \phi)##.

Here:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0003173.pdf
in equation 3,4, they have computed the norm for the brane in a similar fashion but for a different metric. They had ##ds^2 = -u(r) dt^2 + \frac{1}{u(r)}dr^2 + r^2 d\Omega_3^2## and got ##N_a = (-\dot{R}, \dot{T},0,0,0)## so I also expect to have a #\dot{T}# in my normal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give more information, so that we don't have to read the paper. For instance, this
John Greger said:
Since we are interested in dynamical solutions, we let the positions on the brane be ##(t,r, \theta, \phi) \rightarrow (T(\tau), R(\tau), \theta, \phi)##.
looks like a curve not a surface. Or is this a one parameter family of surfaces, ##\tau## the parameter of the family and ##\theta, \phi## the surface parameters?
 
martinbn said:
Can you give more information, so that we don't have to read the paper. For instance, this

looks like a curve not a surface. Or is this a one parameter family of surfaces, ##\tau## the parameter of the family and ##\theta, \phi## the surface parameters?
Hi!The dot is ##\partial_\tau##. The parameters R and T are coordinates on the bubble wall as functions of proper time. Sorry for not giving more context from the paper, I believe it is not very useful, they more or less just state the norm of a bubble wall in a different spacetime background, but I do not understand how they obtained it either. But I believe it could give a hint on the form of the normal vector I am looking for but I am not sure.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K