How do I separate the real and imaginary parts of an infinite product?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on separating the real and imaginary parts of an infinite product defined by a complex-valued function, specifically the function \( F(z) = \prod_{k=1}^{\infty} f_k(z) \). The closed form expressions for the real and imaginary parts of the partial product \( F_k(z) \) are given as \( U_k(z) \) and \( V_k(z) \), with specific summation formulas involving the real and imaginary components \( u_j(z) \) and \( v_j(z) \) of each factor \( f_j(z) \). The discussion also highlights the convergence of these functions and the relationship between the product's magnitude and angle when expressed in polar form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis, particularly complex functions and their properties.
  • Familiarity with infinite products and convergence criteria.
  • Knowledge of the Gamma function and its properties in complex analysis.
  • Basic experience with mathematical notation and summation conventions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the Gamma function, specifically its real and imaginary parts in complex analysis.
  • Learn about convergence criteria for infinite products in complex functions.
  • Explore the use of polar coordinates in complex multiplication and its implications for real and imaginary components.
  • Investigate computational tools like WolframAlpha for deriving complex function properties and expressions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, researchers studying infinite products, and anyone interested in the properties of the Gamma function and its applications in complex variables.

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
TL;DR
Just polling to see if anybody knows
Suppose you have a complex-valued function of a complex variable (namely, ##z=x+iy, \, \, x,y\in \mathbb{R}##) defined as the assumed convergent infinite product

$$F(z)=\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}f_{k}(z)$$

Further suppose ##F(x+iy)=u(x,y)+i v(x,y)##, where u and v are real-valued functions.
How to write “closed form” expressions for u and v in terms of the ##f_k##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends what you mean by closed form. An infinite product would generally not be considered a closed form.
Perhaps what you are after are expressions for ##U_k(z)## and ##V_k(z)##, which are the real and imaginary parts of the partial product ##F_k(z)\triangleq \prod_{j=1}^k f_k(z)##. If the infinite product in the OP is convergent then we would expect ##U_k## and ##V_k## to be convergent, to functions ##U,V:\mathbb C\to \mathbb R##, such that ##F(z)=U(z)+iV(z)##.
Closed forms for the partial products are:
$$U_k(z) = \sum_{s\in \{0,1\}^k} r_u(h(s))\prod_{j=1}^k
u_j(z)^{1-s_j} v_j(z)^{s_j}$$
$$V_k(z) = \sum_{s\in \{0,1\}^k} r_v(h(s))\prod_{j=1}^k
u_j(z)^{1-s_j} v_j(z)^{s_j}$$
where ##h(s) = \left(\sum_{j=1}^{\mathrm{length}(s)} s_j\right) \mod 4##
##r_u(m)## is 1 if ##m=0##, -1 if ##m=2## and 0 otherwise
##r_v(m)## is 1 if ##m=1##, -1 if ##m=3## and 0 otherwise
##u_j(z)## and ##v_j(z)## are the real and imaginary parts of ##f_j(z)##.
 
What does the notation ##s\in\left\{ 0,1\right\}^k## mean?
 
It means the sum is for s ranging over all elements of the set ##\{0,1\}^k##, which is the set of all sequences of ##k## numerals each of which is either 0, or 1. The set contains ##2^k## different sequences. ##s_j## denotes the ##j##th numeral in sequence ##s##.
 
Assuming the infinite product converges: If you can write each factor zn of the infinite product as zn = rn en (where of course rn > 0 and θnR), then you know that Re(product) = r cos(θ) and Im(product) = r sin(θ), where r = ∏ rn and θ = ∑ θn.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
I take a particular interest in the Gamma function, and I'm curious why I've never read any formulas for the real and imaginary parts of the Gamma function in any of my reading. Granted I have only read things in library books and websites and the texts I personally own, I do not have access to pay maths journals and such, but wouldn't these be useful to someone? I personally cannot get WolframAlpha to output these formulae as if either I do not know how to ask it for them or it does not know them (I did pay for it as a phone app, idk if that matters but I imagine they would need to make a business decision as to what constitutes premium content so perhaps it does matter but only thing I've noticed is that certain sep-by-step solutions you need to pay for). I've attempted to write out expressions for ##\Re \left[ \Gamma (x+iy)\right]## and ##\Im \left[\Gamma (x+iy)\right]## but ran into a few things I did not know how to deal with yet, still learning I guess. Is it that expressions for these are known but not particularly useful? I searched NIST's website as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
913
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K