How do I solve for the length of a hanging cable with no friction?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving problems related to the dynamics of a hanging cable, a particle under a time-dependent force, and a mass-spring system. The subject area includes mechanics and dynamics, focusing on concepts such as energy conservation, motion equations, and equilibrium conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the length of the hanging cable over time using a formula involving hyperbolic cosine, while expressing uncertainty about the integration process. Some participants suggest using energy equations and considering the acceleration of the system in terms of the cable's length. Others mention the relevance of catenary equations and the simplification of exponentials in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various approaches and insights into the problems. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of energy equations and the need for integration, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has not provided their attempts for all problems, which is a requirement for receiving help according to forum rules. There is also a mention of potential confusion regarding the relationship between the cable's behavior and catenary equations.

GreenLRan
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I have three questions. I've worked on these for several hours and havn't come up with very much at all. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

1.a perfectly flexible cable has length l. Initially, the cable is at rest, with a length xnaught of it hanging vertically over the edge of a table. Neglecting friction compute the length hanging over the edge after a time t. Assume that the sections of the cable remain straight during the motion.

(I am assuming the cable (l) is laying horizontaly on top of the table, then xnaught is hanging from the corner downward.)

For this problem the correct answer is x=xnaught*cosh(sqrt(g/l)*t).
How do you arrive at this answer?

2.A particle of mass m, initially at rest, moves on a horizontal line subject to a force F(t)=a*e^(-b*t). Find its position and velocity as a function of time.

Correct answers are:
v(t)=(a/(b*m))*(1-e^(-b*t))
x(t)=xnaught+ (a/(b*m))*[t-1/b(1-e^(-b*t))]


3. A massless spring of rest length l and spring constant k has a mass m attached to one end. The system is set on a table with the mass vertically above the spring.

a) What is the new equilibrium height of the mass above the table?
b) The spring is compressed a distance c below the new equilibrium point and released. Find the motion of the mass assuming the free end of the spring remains in contact with the table.
c) Find the critical compression for which the spring will break contact with the table.

(I don't have the answers to this problem. I just needed to check mine.)
Thanks,
Nick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Nick,

According to the rules of this forum, you have to post your attempts at solving the problem in order to get help.
 
Sorry, I appologize for not reading the rules of the forum beforehand.

for the first problem I drew a FBD of the table and the cable. I was reading about catenary's and see that it's almost the same (one end is just flat, which is where the square root comes from inside the cosh() I think). for a catenary "y=a*cosh(x/a)"
I'm kind of lost as to where to begin integrating from to arrive at the correct answer. Maybe I'm looking at it the wrong way. Thanks.
 
well... for the first one, you can probably do the energy equation. set reference on the table...

the sum of energy at one point should equal total energy.

potential energy can be calculated using center of mass.
 
For the first one, it's best to find the acceleration of the system in terms of the length x of cable hanging over the edge. That should be simple enough (Perhaps assign the cable a linear density \lambda). Do you have such an equation yet? Next, do a little integrating and you'll end up with the answer (that's the tricky part). The "cosh" has nothing to do with a catenary. It's just a simplification of exponentials which result from natural logs which come from integrations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K