How do i visualize probability in double slit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around visualizing the probability of an electron's position as it travels through a vacuum, particularly in the context of the double-slit experiment. Participants explore concepts related to wavefunctions, probability distributions, and the effects of confinement on quantum behavior, touching on both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the probability of an electron being in various places is not "real" until observed, questioning how to visualize this phenomenon over a distance of 500 million Planck lengths.
  • Another participant argues that the probability distribution is always present everywhere and that the wavefunction changes shape rather than moving like a wave, challenging the initial visualization approach.
  • There is a discussion about whether the peak of the probability wave moves linearly and how it behaves after an observation, with some suggesting that the electron's behavior is governed by quantum mechanics rather than classical analogies.
  • Participants debate the implications of the container's dimensions on the electron's energy states and wavefunction shape, with one noting that a smaller container might not accommodate the electron.
  • Questions arise about how the wavefunction's shape is determined and whether it can be visualized through simulations or specific setups, with a request for resources to aid in understanding.
  • There is mention of how the initial state of the electron, including its energy, influences its behavior and the resulting wavefunction, with some uncertainty about the timing of these effects in relation to the electron's departure from its source.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of probability distributions and wavefunctions, with no consensus reached on how to visualize these concepts or the implications of measurement on quantum behavior.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in understanding arise from the complexity of quantum mechanics, with participants acknowledging challenges in visualizing and mathematically describing the behavior of electrons in various states and environments.

jimmylegss
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I know an electron when not interfered with after leaving it's source is not really in any space. It just has a probability of being in various places, it isn't real yet.

But how do i visualize how that happens? Let's say over 500 million Planck lengths in a vaccuum.

Does the probability move like a wave from where it left to the wall? Let's say it moves 90% light speed, so it would take 450 million Planck time units to get to the other side (this is average right?, almost never precise, even when distance would be precise. It would be purely random how many Planck time units it would take, if it would take longer it would arrive with more energy, and if it would take shorter then it would arrive with less energy?).

Would the most likely place to find after 225 million time Planck units exactly (or roughly, but still relatively precisely) be in the middle of this box with the length of 500 million Planck lenghts (so at 250 million Planck lenghts)?

Would the peak of this probability wave (so where it is most likely to be) move from where it left to the other side of the wall in a linear fashion, sort of like a regular sound or water wave? How do i visualize how these probabilities move in time?

Same with after you would 'intercept' this electron half way through. The superposition would collapse, and it would move as a particle. Does that mean the quantum weirdness dissapears, or simply that the probability wave becomes very narrow? And after the observation the electron goes back to it's quantum weirdness? Except in a very narrow wave form so it looks as if it behaves as a particle now.

Finally how much would the width of this space matter (still with the same 500 million Planck length unit length as before)? Would it make a big difference if it was also 500 million Planck lengths wide, or let's say 100 billion Planck lenghts wide?

Im still really bad at math, so i find it hard to extract this from the equations yet.:)

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimmylegss said:
I know an electron when not interfered with after leaving it's source is not really in any space. It just has a probability of being in various places, it isn't real yet.

But how do i visualize how that happens?
you don't, its just maths.
also, "not really in any place" does not make sense... you are certain to detect it in some place so it is really there.

Plank units are note useful for your discussion, they are a destraction.

jimmylegss said:
Does the probability move like a wave from where it left to the wall?
No. The probability distribution is always everywhere. The wavefunction changes shape like a wave does.

jimmylegss said:
Would the peak of this probability wave (so where it is most likely to be) move from where it left to the other side of the wall in a linear fashion, sort of like a regular sound or water wave? How do i visualize how these probabilities move in time
You are thnking of like the electron is confined between two walls?
How the wavefunction changes shape depends on the details of the electron state. It can look like a pulse boyncing back and forth, or a traveling wave, or it may be a stationary state so the peeak does not change position.

jimmylegss said:
Same with after you would 'intercept' this electron half way through. The superposition would collapse, and it would move as a particle. Does that mean the quantum weirdness dissapears, or simply that the probability wave becomes very narrow? And after the observation the electron goes back to it's quantum weirdness? Except in a very narrow wave form so it looks as if it behaves as a particle now.
No. The electron always obeys quantum mechamics.
it never moves as a wave or as a particle but as itself.
the wave stuff is how we predict the results of experiments, the particle stuff is what we measure.

jimmylegss said:
Same with after you would 'intercept' this electron half way through. The superposition would collapse, and it would move as a particle. Does that mean the quantum weirdness dissapears, or simply that the probability wave becomes very narrow? And after the observation the electron goes back to it's quantum weirdness? Except in a very narrow wave form so it looks as if it behaves as a particle now
the electron always obeys quantum mechanics, this may or may not be "weird" depending on how you look at it.
The wavefunction always occupies all space.

finally how much would the width of this space matter (still with the same 500 million Planck length unit length as before)? Would it make a big difference if it was also 500 million Planck lengths wide, or let's say 100 billion Planck lenghts wide?
The dimensions of the container determines the available energy states. The use of plank lengths here is probably misleading, but a container too small may not fit the electton.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
Thanks for the response.

Simon Bridge said:
No. The probability distribution is always everywhere. The wavefunction changes shape like a wave does.
What determines it shape? I guess i don't use the Planck lenghts, instead I just use time units and a cube of one by one metre.

I shoot an electron from the middle of one of the walls with speed of 90% light speed of this hollow cube to the other side , and aim at the exact middle at the other side. It is a vacuum. If I split this experiment up in 10 even units of time between leaving and hitting the other side, what would the wave function look like? Is there some website you can insert values to kind of see for yourself?

Simon Bridge said:
You are thnking of like the electron is confined between two walls?
How the wavefunction changes shape depends on the details of the electron state. It can look like a pulse boyncing back and forth, or a traveling wave, or it may be a stationary state so the peak does not change position.
how would you get these different looking shapes in time? Does the electron state means how much energy you give the state, and does it depend on the environment it is 'shot' in from whatever atom it left? Later in your post you say that the size of the container influences how the probability wave will look. Is that determined instantaneously after the electron leaves the atom? Sort of like with quantum entanglement?
 
jimmylegss said:
I shoot an electron from the middle of one of the walls with speed of 90% light speed of this hollow cube to the other side , and aim at the exact middle at the other side. It is a vacuum. If I split this experiment up in 10 even units of time between leaving and hitting the other side, what would the wave function look like? Is there some website you can insert values to kind of see for yourself?
I don't knownof any such website.
The setup above would be well described by classical mechanics ànd is similar to what you get inside a crt ... only bigger.
In qm we say that the electron is prepared with a well defined initial position and momentum, the exact distribution determined by the source, which you have not described.

We would be able to represent the initial state mathematically as a superposition of energy eigenstates (or whatever seems convenient for the calculation we need to do) for the box. We'd then use the time dependent Schrödinger equn to time-evolve the total wavefunction. The likely result would have the principle max propagate much as you'd think the classical particle would. More precisely, the expectation value of position would propagate as the classical particle.

jimmylegss said:
how would you get these different looking shapes in time?
carefully. A common approach is to use electrons confined to a metal and use a laser to excite particular states.

Does the electron state means how much energy you give the state, and does it depend on the environment it is 'shot' in from whatever atom it left? Later in your post you say that the size of the container influences how the probability wave will look. Is that determined instantaneously after the electron leaves the atom? Sort of like with quantum entanglement?
the state of a particle is the minimum description of what you need to know about it ... this will include the energy.
It is determined by the totality of the influences on it... so you are not actually being specific enough. In an atom, the state is often described by 3 or 4 quantum numbers.
How the probability waves looks is mathematics and is independent of the presence of the electron itself. The wavefunction is not physical so it does not need a cause.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
This might be a good place to start:

Teaching Feynman’s sum-over-paths quantum theory
Edwin F. Taylor, Stamatis Vokos, John M. O’Meara and Nora S. Thornber
Comput. Phys. 12, 190 (1998); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.168652
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/cip/12/2/10.1063/1.168652

http://www.eftaylor.com/download.html#quantum
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Or Feynmans own description... but these are not wave mechanics are they?
Per the title, the double slit experiment, the probability distribution does not change with time during the experiment.
The idea that some electron wave travels through the slits is a common misunderstanding.
 
Thanks for the response, allthough that last part is not entirely clear. Let's say the electron leaves location A, and before it arrives, location B (where the electron was aimed at) is moved to a different location further away (or closer to) A. Does this affect the probability distribution of where to find the electron between A and B before it actually arrives at B?
 
The probability of detecting an electron depends on the position of the detector, type of detector, and the geometry of the setup... moving the detector about adds a dynamic component to the calculation. If you were to move the detector to a new location before the electron could possibly have reached the old one, there would be no difference to the way the probability was calculated... it would be whatever the probability at the new location would have been anyway, if the detector was there all along. The distribution is not usually thought of as affected by the detector... unless you put the detector inside one of the slits - which changes the geometry of the experiment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K