How Do Orientations Affect Total Flow into a Tetrahedron?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TopCat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Net Tetrahedron
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concept of flow across surfaces in relation to the orientation of triangles within a tetrahedron, as explored in "Advanced Calculus: A Differential Forms Approach." The key conclusion is that the total flow into a regular tetrahedron with vertices PQRS, where PQR lies in the xy-plane and S is at (0,0,1), does not sum to zero due to incorrect orientation of the triangles. The triangles PQR, PQS, QRS, and PRS must be oriented correctly to reflect their respective contributions to the total flow, which is governed by the right-hand rule and the divergence theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms and two-forms
  • Familiarity with the right-hand rule for determining orientations
  • Knowledge of the divergence theorem in vector calculus
  • Basic geometry of tetrahedrons and their projections in 3D space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the divergence theorem in various geometrical contexts
  • Learn about the right-hand rule and its implications for surface integrals
  • Explore the properties of oriented areas in vector calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between flow and incompressibility in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying advanced calculus, vector calculus, and fluid dynamics, will benefit from this discussion. It is especially relevant for those grappling with the concepts of orientation and flow in multi-dimensional spaces.

TopCat
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I'm working through Advanced Calculus: A Differential Forms Approach at my leisure. In going over two-forms the notions of "flow across an area" and "oriented area" are introduced I hit a brick wall with grasping orientations, though, when asked to find the total flow into a tetrahedron.

So this is what's confusing me. For a unit flow in the z-direction of xyz-space, the flow across a surface is just the oriented area dxdy of the surface. So all I have to do to answer the question is find the oriented areas of the projections of all four component triangles of the tetrahedron on the xy-plane and add them together. The result should clearly be zero since, intuitively, the flow is uniform so that nothing is accumulating inside the tetrahedron and, therefore, flow in = flow out.

If I have a regular tetrahedron with vertices PQRS, PQR in the xy-plane and S at point (0,0,1), then the projection looks like a triangle with S at the centroid.
[PLAIN]http://www.j1n.org/srs/misc/tetra.JPG
Since each triangle is oriented in the direction P \rightarrow Q \rightarrow R \rightarrow S then we have the four component oriented triangles PQR, PQS, QRS, and PRS.

Since A_{PQS} + A_{QRS} + A_{PRS} = A_{PQR} (where A denotes area), each of the smaller triangles must have an orientation opposite the big triangle so the total sum of oriented areas is zero. But given the orientation of the vertices, QRS, PQR and PQS have the same orientation (all are counter-clockwise) so the total flow into won't sum to zero.

So clearly I've oriented two of the triangles wrong. I'm confused as to how I should establish orientation if I can't go by the handedness of the direction given by the vertices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Clockwiseness is in the eye of the beholder. Imagine yourself moving around the tetrahedron on the outside so you can look directly at each face. In your picture you already are pretty much viewing face PQS and QRS and they are counterclockwise from your viewpoint, which would correspond to an outward normal by the right hand rule.

If you are standing on the left of the object, you would have to use PSR for the same counterclockwise orientation, and if you were underneath looking up you would use PSQ.

Also you wouldn't expect zero total flow unless the flow was incompressible, for then by the divergence theorem

\int\int_S \vec F \cdot d\vec S = \int\int\int_V \nabla \cdot \vec F\, dV= 0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K