How Do Pulley Systems Affect Mass Acceleration and Tension?

  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a pulley system with two masses, m1 and m2, connected by strings. Participants are exploring the relationships between the accelerations of the masses and the tensions in the strings, as well as the implications of the pulley's mass on these relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the accelerations a1 and a2, with some suggesting that a1 could be twice a2. Others question the implications of the pulley's acceleration on these relationships and the validity of certain equations presented in external solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the assumptions made regarding the pulley's mass and its effect on the forces involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between tensions and accelerations, but there is no explicit consensus on how to derive the final expressions for T1, T2, a1, and a2.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the assumption that the pulley is very light, which raises questions about the validity of certain force equations. There is also mention of external resources that provide solutions, but concerns about their applicability are being discussed.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Mass m1 on a frictionless horizontal table is connected
to mass m2 by means of a very light pulley P1 and a light
fixed pulley P2 as shown in Figure 1. (a) If a1 and a2
are the accelerations of m1 and m2 , respectively, what is
the relationship between these accelerations? Express
(b) the tensions in the strings and (c) the accelerations
a1 and a2 in terms of the masses m1 and m2 and g.

Now I set up following equations

m[2]g - T[2] = m[2]a[2]

where a[2] is downward acceleration of m[2].

Also T[1]=m[1](a[r]+a[2])

where a[r] is acceleration of m[1] relative to P1. I have attached the Figure 1.
Now I have no idea how to proceed. I have to solve for T[1], T[2] and a[2] and
a[1]=a[r]+a[2] in terms of m[1], m[2] and g. Please help
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    5.9 KB · Views: 641
Physics news on Phys.org
if the pulley moves with acceleration a2, and assuming that the rope connecting M1 to the wall doesn't stretch, what else can you say about a1?
 
can i say that a1 is 2 times a2 ?
 
yup, you got it
 
but that still doesn't help solve a1,a2 and T1 , T2 in terms of m1, m2 and g. how do i
do that ?
 
IssacNewton said:
but that still doesn't help solve a1,a2 and T1 , T2 in terms of m1, m2 and g. how do i
do that ?
You have got the solution http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfadd/1350/Hmwk/Ch05/Ch5.html" . Look at the example 5.2. Scroll down for the solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
method_man, i looked at the given solution. thanks for that. but i see one problem in the solution given. at one point they say
2T1=T2 at the pulley P1. But pulley P1 is accelerating to the right with acceleration a2. So how can we equate the forces
acting on it in the left direction to the forces acting on it in the right direction. If 2T1=T2 , pulley P1 would either be at rest
or move with constant velocity.

thanks
 
Last edited:
Yes, that's a good question. But in your problem you said that P1 is a very light pulley.
So therefore, you have two T1 forces looking left and T2 force looking right. If P1 would have some significant mass then you would have additional force which is equal to pulley mass multiplied with a1.
 
i think its better to let pulley P1 have some mass m3. and we can set up the equation
T2 - 2T1 = m3*a2. and then we can apply the limit that m3 tend to zero. in this way we can get the equation we want (which is T2 = 2*T1) without compromising any physics.
so the above equation is true in the limit that m3 tend to zero. i think i feel comfortable
in this way of thinking about it. actually this is what i thought when i began with the problem but then the fact that pulley P1 is nearly massless stumped me and I couldn't get around that and come up with an equation. thanks again to both of you.

Issac Newton
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K