How Do Squared Vector Components Relate to the Dot Product?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between squared vector components and the dot product, particularly in the context of vector magnitudes and their representation in Cartesian coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the connection between the squared terms of vector components and the dot product, questioning how the expression for the magnitude of a vector relates to the dot product formulation.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the mathematical relationships, while others express confusion about the transition from squared components to the dot product notation. There is an ongoing exploration of the underlying principles without a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the need for clarity in understanding vector operations and the implications of using Pythagorean theorem in a three-dimensional space. There are mentions of specific notations and formulas that may require further elaboration.

Oblio
Messages
398
Reaction score
0
This technically a homework question, but needed for homework and understanding for homework to come. Just hope to get it cleared up, thanks again!

1. This formula is given:

r[tex]_{1}[/tex]s[tex]_{1}[/tex] + r[tex]_{2}[/tex]s[tex]_{s}[/tex]+ r[tex]_{e}[/tex]s[tex]^{3}[/tex] = [tex]\sum[/tex]r[tex]_{n}[/tex]s[tex]_{n}[/tex] (with the limits etc. not too important).

Then, in respect to scalar products, the magnitude of any vector is denoted by l r l or by Pythoagora's theorem: square root of[r(1)[tex]^{2}[/tex] + r(2)[tex]^{2}[/tex] + r(3)[tex]^{2}[/tex]]
(couldn't find square root in latex)

and that THAT is the same as square root of [r . r]
This last step I do not follow...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know that it's true, (in reading my text) but how does 3 squared terms boil down to r^2?
 
This is a vector operation.

One squares the corresponding vector components represented in each of three dimensions, which are orthogonal in the Cartesian system.

The magnitude r is given as the sqrt of the sum of the squares, i.e. r = sqrt (r12 + r22 + r32), so

r2 = r12 + r22 + r32
 
Last edited:
Oblio said:
I know that it's true, (in reading my text) but how does 3 squared terms boil down to r^2?

See [tex]\vec{r}\cdot\vec{r}[/tex] is nothing but [tex]\sca{r}\sca{r}\cos\theta[/tex]. But [tex]\theta[/tex] = 0 and so [tex]\cos\theta[/tex] = 1.

Hence [tex]\vec{r}\cdot\vec{r}[/tex] = [tex]^{}r^2[/tex]

Now a projection of a vector on an axis is known as the component of the vector on that axis. So take a cartesian system and draw any arbritary vector and drop perpendiculars on the x y and z axis. Now try using pythagoras theorem for this and you will see that how

[tex]\sca{r^2}[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{r^2_x + r^2_y + r^2_z}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K