How Do the Riemann Zeta and Dirichlet Eta Functions Interact?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction between the Riemann Zeta function and the Dirichlet Eta function, exploring their mathematical properties and potential applications in number theory and physics. Participants examine the separation of these functions into terms and their implications, including connections to concepts in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a separation of the Riemann Zeta function into two terms, suggesting a tautological nature in the representation.
  • The same participant derives a similar separation for the Dirichlet Eta function, proposing a relationship between the two functions through the expressions J_+ and J_-.
  • Another participant references a specific form of the Dirichlet Eta function, relating it to the Riemann Zeta function with a particular coefficient.
  • Further context is provided by linking to external resources that discuss the implications of these functions in string theory and other mathematical concepts.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the lack of mention of the Dirichlet Eta function in canonical texts on the Riemann Zeta function, indicating a potential gap in the literature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance and applications of the Dirichlet Eta function in relation to the Riemann Zeta function. There is no consensus on whether the formalism discussed is widely used in number theory or if the functions J_+ and J_- have specific names.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to external literature and suggests that there may be limitations in the existing texts regarding the treatment of the Dirichlet Eta function. The implications of the mathematical relationships presented remain unresolved.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,485
Reaction score
188
Consider the separation of the Riemann Zeta function in two terms

\begin{flalign*}<br /> \zeta(s) &amp;= 1^{-s} + 2^{-s} + 3^{-s} + 4^{-s} + 5^{-s} + 6^{-s} + ... = &amp; \\<br /> &amp;=(1^{-s} + 3^{-s} + 5^{-s} + 7^{-s} + 9^{-s}+ ... ) + <br /> ( 2^{-s} + 4^{-s} + 6^{-s} + 8^{-s} + ...)&amp;=&amp; \\<br /> &amp;= (1 - 2^{-s}) \zeta(s) + 2^{-s} \zeta (s) &amp;=&amp; \zeta (s) &amp;<br /> \end{flalign*}

which is pretty tautological, and now the same play with the Dirichlet Eta function,

\begin{flalign*} <br /> \eta(s) &amp;= 1^{-s} - 2^{-s} + 3^{-s} - 4^{-s} + 5^{-s} - 6^{-s} + ... = \\<br /> &amp;=(1^{-s} + 3^{-s} + 5^{-s} + 7^{-s} + 9^{-s}+ ... ) <br /> - ( 2^{-s} + 4^{-s} + 6^{-s} + 8^{-s} + ...) &amp;=&amp; \\<br /> &amp;= (1 - 2^{-s}) \zeta(s) - 2^{-s} \zeta (s) &amp;=&amp; (1 - 2^{1-s}) \zeta (s) <br /> \end{flalign*}

The pair of functions J_\mp \equiv \frac 12 (\zeta(s) \pm \eta(s)) smells to susy quantum mechanics, doesn't it? Note how the pole (in s=1) of the Zeta function is canceled by substracting both functions, and that the difference between J_+ and J_- amounts to a zero in s=0.

Is this formalism used in number theory? Have the functions J\pm some specific name?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
We have for the Dirichlet Eta

eta(s) = (1 - 1/(2**(s - 1))*zeta(s)

(cf Derbyshire, Prime obsession, p 148)
 
RamaWolf said:
(cf Derbyshire, Prime obsession, p 148)

Also "Gamma", by Julian Havil. And I am a bit puzzled that the canonical text on the subject of Riemann Zeta Function, the one of H. M. Edwards, does not seem to find any use for this function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K