How Do We Determine the Sun's Generation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hkyriazi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Sun is classified as a Population I star, derived from the remnants of earlier generations, likely 2nd or 3rd generation stars. The Milky Way's thin disc, which formed prior to the Sun, contains elements from neutron star mergers and has contributed to the Sun's composition. Stellar metallicity varies significantly, impacting the understanding of star formation and the age of the universe. Techniques such as plotting the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram of star clusters allow astronomers to estimate the ages of these clusters, which are consistent with the universe's age of approximately 13 billion years as derived from Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar classification (Population I, II, III)
  • Familiarity with stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis
  • Knowledge of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
  • Basic concepts of cosmic age estimation and the Big Bang theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methods for determining stellar ages using the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
  • Explore the implications of neutron star mergers on stellar composition
  • Study the characteristics and significance of Population III stars
  • Investigate the Cosmic Microwave Background and its role in estimating the universe's age
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of cosmology interested in stellar evolution, cosmic age estimation, and the formation of the Milky Way galaxy.

hkyriazi
Messages
174
Reaction score
2
Given that a star's lifetime depends significantly upon its initial mass, do we really know what generation the sun is? I'd always assumed it was 2nd (or 3rd) generation, being derived from the exploded remnant of a 1st or 2nd generation star, but given the possible large variability in ages of stars, I'm no longer sure about that assumption. I understand the grouping into Population I (such as the sun), Population II, and the hypothetical, very short-lived Population III (or have we actually seen some of these at the edge of our observable universe?). Another way of asking the question is, does the metallicity of Population I stars vary greatly, such that some may have been created from the remains of others?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
hkyriazi said:
...does the metallicity of Population I stars vary greatly, such that some may have been created from the remains of others?

The Milky Way's thin disc formed long before the Sun formed. The thin disc contains elements that would have formed in neutron star mergers.
After the thin disc formed stars continued to explode and add material. The shock waves in a gas cloud formed the Sun and solar system.

I do not know what the upper limit is on the number of stars an atom could have been part of. A significant fraction would have been in a population 1 star before finding it's way to the sun. Some of the hydrogen and helium would have never been in a star.

There is variability in stellar metalicity. The cloud is mixed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hkyriazi
What I'm actually concerned with--and perhaps I should've considered this before my original post--is whether we have a solid idea of the ages of the various stars, such as to independently confirm the age of the universe calculated on the basis of the redshift/distance relationship (Hubble Constant, etc.). In other words, does our knowledge of stellar evolution, and associated nuclear and nucleosynthetic reactions, allow us to affix an age to the Universe since the "Big Bang"?
 
It is possible to determine the age of individual stars, but the best way to do what you are asking is to work with clusters of stars. This website explains the technique. By plotting the HR diagram of a cluster, we can determine the age of the cluster by looking at the most massive stars which are still on the main sequence. This paper shows a recent estimate of the ages of the oldest known clusters. They appear to be a little more than 11 Gy old, which is consistent with the age of the universe calculated from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), which gives an age of the universe of a little more than 13 Gy. It took some time after the Big Bang before the universe cooled and "clumped" enough for stars to begin to form. The time after the decoupling of the CMB and before the formation of the first stars is often referred to as the "Dark Ages".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hkyriazi
hkyriazi said:
In other words, does our knowledge of stellar evolution, and associated nuclear and nucleosynthetic reactions, allow us to affix an age to the Universe since the "Big Bang"?

No. All you know is that the universe can be no younger than it's oldest known star. In fact, the very oldest known stars are about half a billion years younger than the universe as a whole.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
No. All you know is that the universe can be no younger than it's oldest known star. In fact, the very oldest known stars are about half a billion years younger than the universe as a whole.

Thanks. I should have said "...allow us roughly to affix an age to the Universe since the "Big Bang"..."

I found some recent links from a google search for "oldest stars," including this: http://www.astronomy.com/news/2018/11/red-dwarf-is-one-of-the-oldest-in-the-universe
I assume this is what you were referring to. Interesting that this seems to not have formed from the remnants of hypothesized, short-lived "Population III" stars.
 
phyzguy said:
It is possible to determine the age of individual stars, but the best way to do what you are asking is to work with clusters of stars. This website explains the technique. By plotting the HR diagram of a cluster, we can determine the age of the cluster by looking at the most massive stars which are still on the main sequence. This paper shows a recent estimate of the ages of the oldest known clusters. ...

Thank you! The University of Oregon website, though somewhat sketchy (and assuming a solid background in astrophysics), gave the basic idea (and seemed to be written by a non-native English speaker). The review by Lawrence Krauss (and Chaboyer) is much appreciated, as it covers the entire "age estimate of the universe" thoroughly. Nice that it was freely downloadable.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K