In all the introductions to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation I've seen, they make the following claim:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

"If you write out the stationary Schrodinger equation for the simplest molecule -- H[itex]_2^+[/itex] -- even it cannot be solved analytically, so we are forced to make an approximation."

But how do weknowit can't be solved analytically? Is that something that can beproved, or is it just the case that no one has been clever enough to figure out the analytical solution?

My question probably stems from a misunderstanding of what the word "analytical" means. I'd love for someone to clear this up for me!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How do we *know* the Schrodinger equation for H2+ can't be solved?

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for *know* Schrodinger equation |
---|

A Nonlinear Schrodinger equation and linearity of Q.M. |

B How do we know we have a single-photon source? |

I Can the Schrodinger equation satisfy Laplace's equation? |

B How do we know some particles don't exist until measured? |

B How do we know superposition exists? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**