- #51
Rainer
- 32
- 0
Very well.
I've understood you completely--and wrote on that knowledge.
I've understood you completely--and wrote on that knowledge.
How do we know what existence is?
- Thread starter Les Sleeth
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Logic
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of existence, the concept of God, and the validity of proofs regarding existence and non-existence. Participants argue about the distinction between concepts and their representations, emphasizing that existence is understood through experience rather than pure reason. A key point raised is that one cannot empirically prove the non-existence of God, as lack of evidence does not equate to proof of non-existence. The debate touches on the identity of God, with arguments suggesting that if God possesses indefinite qualities, it contradicts the requirement for identity in existents. Some participants propose that God could be viewed as a potentiality from which all things arise, while others argue that this definition diminishes the significance of God. The conversation also critiques rationalism and empiricism, with claims that rationalist philosophy has failed to produce knowledge compared to experiential approaches. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of proving existence and the philosophical implications surrounding the concept of God.