MHB How Do We Prove That 'P' Doesn't Vary for Different Free Variables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathworker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particular solution
mathworker
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
I am studying Introduction to linear Algebra by Gilbert Strang while calculating the particular solution P for $Ax=b$,he made the free variables $0$ to calculate the particular solution and said that P along with linear combinations of null space solutions make up the complete set.
I understood that particular solution is 'particular' because there is only one solution to system of equation but how do we prove that 'P' doesn't vary for different free variable ( I mean other than $0$)??​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: particular sollution for Ax=b

mathworker said:
how do we prove that 'P' doesn't vary for different free variable ( I mean other than $0$)??
A particular solution definitely varies with the choice of values of free variables because these values are a part of a solution. But the set of all solutions to the system does not depend on the choice of a particular solution.

There is the following fact. Let $L$ be a linear subspace and let $v$ be a particular vector (not necesarily in $L$). If $v'\in L+v$, then $L+v=L+v'$. Indeed, suppose that $v'=u+v$ where $u\in L$. Then an arbitrary vector in $L+v$ has the form $w+v$ where $w\in L$. But $w+v=w+v+u-u=(w-u)+v'$ and $w-u\in L$. The fact that $L+v'\subseteq L+v$ is proved similarly.

Returning to the system of linear equations, $L$ is the null space of $A$ and $v,v'$ are particular solutions. The choice of a particular solution does not change the set of all solutions.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
778
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K