MHB How Do We Prove That 'P' Doesn't Vary for Different Free Variables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathworker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particular solution
mathworker
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
I am studying Introduction to linear Algebra by Gilbert Strang while calculating the particular solution P for $Ax=b$,he made the free variables $0$ to calculate the particular solution and said that P along with linear combinations of null space solutions make up the complete set.
I understood that particular solution is 'particular' because there is only one solution to system of equation but how do we prove that 'P' doesn't vary for different free variable ( I mean other than $0$)??​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: particular sollution for Ax=b

mathworker said:
how do we prove that 'P' doesn't vary for different free variable ( I mean other than $0$)??
A particular solution definitely varies with the choice of values of free variables because these values are a part of a solution. But the set of all solutions to the system does not depend on the choice of a particular solution.

There is the following fact. Let $L$ be a linear subspace and let $v$ be a particular vector (not necesarily in $L$). If $v'\in L+v$, then $L+v=L+v'$. Indeed, suppose that $v'=u+v$ where $u\in L$. Then an arbitrary vector in $L+v$ has the form $w+v$ where $w\in L$. But $w+v=w+v+u-u=(w-u)+v'$ and $w-u\in L$. The fact that $L+v'\subseteq L+v$ is proved similarly.

Returning to the system of linear equations, $L$ is the null space of $A$ and $v,v'$ are particular solutions. The choice of a particular solution does not change the set of all solutions.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top