How do we solve the ODE for the initial value problem with Burger's equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter docnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode Pde
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the initial value problem for Burger's equation, specifically addressing the substitution and integration steps involved. The initial condition is given as u(0,x)=g, leading to the expression for φ(0,x) derived from the separable ODE. Participants point out a misquoted boundary condition and the omission of a constant of integration, clarifying that this will not impact the function u(0,x). The integration steps are confirmed to be correct, with no further questions raised. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the mathematical process of solving the ODE related to Burger's equation.
docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
488
Homework Statement
please see below
Relevant Equations
please see below
Sorry the problem is a bit long to read. thank you to anyone who comments.

Screen Shot 2021-03-25 at 11.41.05 PM.png

We consider the initial value problem for the Burger's equation with viscosity given by
$$\begin{cases} \partial_t u-\partial^2_xu+u\partial_xu=0 & \text{in}\quad (1,T)\times R\\\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad u(0,\cdot)=g & \text{on}\quad \{t=0\}\times R \end{cases}$$
(1) We know that ##u(0,x)=g## so the substitution of the Burger equation gives $$u(0,x)=\boxed{g=\frac{-2}{\phi(0,x)}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\phi(0,x)}$$ which is a separable ODE for ##\psi:=\phi(0,x)##. \\\\To solve the ODE, we re-write the equation
$$\Rightarrow \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\Big[ln(\phi(0,x))\Big]=-\frac{g}{2}$$
and integrate
$$\Rightarrow \int\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\Big[ln(\phi(0,x))\Big]dx=-\int \frac{g}{2} dx$$
$$\Rightarrow ln(\phi(0,x))=-\int \frac{g}{2} dx$$
then exponentiate
$$\Rightarrow \phi(0,x)=\boxed{exp(-\int\frac{g}{2}dx)}$$
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2021-03-25 at 11.41.05 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2021-03-25 at 11.41.05 PM.png
    28.4 KB · Views: 181
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks ok. Are you just seeking confirmation?
You did misquote a boundary as (1,T) instead of (0,T).
 
Technically you are missing a constant of integration. This will not affect ##u(0,\cdot)## however as it will cancel between denominator and numerator in the definition of ##u## in terms of ##\phi##.

Was there a question here?
 
Orodruin said:
you are missing a constant of integration
It was left as an indefinite integral.
 
haruspex said:
Looks ok. Are you just seeking confirmation?
You did misquote a boundary as (1,T) instead of (0,T).
Orodruin said:
Technically you are missing a constant of integration. This will not affect ##u(0,\cdot)## however as it will cancel between denominator and numerator in the definition of ##u## in terms of ##\phi##.

Was there a question here?

Thanks! :bow: No questions, but I was unsure about the following step.

docnet said:
and integrate
$$\Rightarrow \int\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\Big[ln(\phi(0,x))\Big]dx=-\int \frac{g}{2} dx$$
$$\Rightarrow ln(\phi(0,x))=-\int \frac{g}{2} dx$$
 
docnet said:
Thanks! :bow: No questions, but I was unsure about the following step.
Yes, that's fine.
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...