How do we solve the ODE for the initial value problem with Burger's equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter docnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode Pde
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the initial value problem for Burger's equation with viscosity, specifically the equation $$\partial_t u - \partial^2_x u + u \partial_x u = 0$$ in the domain $(0,T) \times \mathbb{R}$. The initial condition is given by $$u(0,x) = g$$, leading to the substitution $$g = \frac{-2}{\phi(0,x)}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\phi(0,x)$$. The solution process involves integrating the logarithmic form of the equation, resulting in $$\phi(0,x) = \exp\left(-\int \frac{g}{2} dx\right)$$. The discussion highlights the importance of including a constant of integration, although it does not affect the final form of $$u(0,\cdot)$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with Burger's equation and its applications
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in calculus
  • Proficiency in handling initial value problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Burger's equation in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about the method of characteristics for solving nonlinear PDEs
  • Explore the implications of viscosity in Burger's equation solutions
  • Investigate the role of boundary conditions in initial value problems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers interested in fluid dynamics, particularly those working with nonlinear partial differential equations and initial value problems.

docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
486
Homework Statement
please see below
Relevant Equations
please see below
Sorry the problem is a bit long to read. thank you to anyone who comments.

Screen Shot 2021-03-25 at 11.41.05 PM.png

We consider the initial value problem for the Burger's equation with viscosity given by
$$\begin{cases} \partial_t u-\partial^2_xu+u\partial_xu=0 & \text{in}\quad (1,T)\times R\\\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad u(0,\cdot)=g & \text{on}\quad \{t=0\}\times R \end{cases}$$
(1) We know that ##u(0,x)=g## so the substitution of the Burger equation gives $$u(0,x)=\boxed{g=\frac{-2}{\phi(0,x)}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\phi(0,x)}$$ which is a separable ODE for ##\psi:=\phi(0,x)##. \\\\To solve the ODE, we re-write the equation
$$\Rightarrow \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\Big[ln(\phi(0,x))\Big]=-\frac{g}{2}$$
and integrate
$$\Rightarrow \int\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\Big[ln(\phi(0,x))\Big]dx=-\int \frac{g}{2} dx$$
$$\Rightarrow ln(\phi(0,x))=-\int \frac{g}{2} dx$$
then exponentiate
$$\Rightarrow \phi(0,x)=\boxed{exp(-\int\frac{g}{2}dx)}$$
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2021-03-25 at 11.41.05 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2021-03-25 at 11.41.05 PM.png
    28.4 KB · Views: 194
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks ok. Are you just seeking confirmation?
You did misquote a boundary as (1,T) instead of (0,T).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet
Technically you are missing a constant of integration. This will not affect ##u(0,\cdot)## however as it will cancel between denominator and numerator in the definition of ##u## in terms of ##\phi##.

Was there a question here?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet
Orodruin said:
you are missing a constant of integration
It was left as an indefinite integral.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet
haruspex said:
Looks ok. Are you just seeking confirmation?
You did misquote a boundary as (1,T) instead of (0,T).
Orodruin said:
Technically you are missing a constant of integration. This will not affect ##u(0,\cdot)## however as it will cancel between denominator and numerator in the definition of ##u## in terms of ##\phi##.

Was there a question here?

Thanks! :bow: No questions, but I was unsure about the following step.

docnet said:
and integrate
$$\Rightarrow \int\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\Big[ln(\phi(0,x))\Big]dx=-\int \frac{g}{2} dx$$
$$\Rightarrow ln(\phi(0,x))=-\int \frac{g}{2} dx$$
 
docnet said:
Thanks! :bow: No questions, but I was unsure about the following step.
Yes, that's fine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K