How Do You Bisect an L-Shaped Figure into Equal Areas?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure Plane
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of bisecting an L-shaped figure into two equal areas. Participants explore various constructions and methods to achieve this, including geometric approaches and considerations of the properties of rectangles involved in the shape.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the L-shaped figure as a rectangle with a rectangular hole cut out, leading to various interpretations of how to bisect it.
  • One proposed method involves drawing a line connecting the centers of the two rectangles that form the L shape, claiming it bisects the area.
  • Another participant suggests that there are multiple lines that can bisect the L shape, depending on the midpoints of the rectangles involved.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the validity of certain constructions, asking for proofs or simpler methods.
  • There is discussion about the existence of infinitely many lines that can bisect the L shape, particularly when considering boundary points and sweeping lines across the figure.
  • Concerns are raised about the constructability of certain angles and lines, with examples given of lines that may bisect the area but are not constructible using traditional methods.
  • Participants note that the non-convex nature of the L shape allows for multiple bisectors, particularly at specific points within the figure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the number of bisectors possible for the L-shaped figure, with some asserting there is only one valid bisector while others argue for the existence of multiple bisectors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the validity of specific constructions and the implications of non-convexity.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention limitations related to the assumptions about the shape and the definitions of bisecting lines, as well as the challenges in constructing certain angles and lines accurately.

  • #31
I wonder if it would not be easier to simply write down equations defining the bisector in terms of the various parameters, and see if it's solvable with square roots.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hurkyl said:
I wonder if it would not be easier to simply write down equations defining the bisector in terms of the various parameters, and see if it's solvable with square roots.

Probably, but I hadn't thought of doing that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K