How Do You Calculate Acceleration from a Velocity-Time Graph?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating acceleration from a velocity-time graph, specifically focusing on determining the acceleration at t=3 seconds based on given velocities at different times.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to apply the formula for acceleration using initial and final velocities at specified times. There are questions about the correctness of calculations and the interpretation of negative values in the context of velocity and acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the results and questioning the calculations presented. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between velocity and acceleration, particularly in terms of slope on the graph.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring clarity in calculations and the importance of showing work. Participants are also considering the implications of the graph's slope at various points in time.

rashad764

Homework Statement


knight_Figure_02_30.jpg

find the accleration at t=3 seconds

Homework Equations


vf-vi/tf-ti

The Attempt at a Solution


velocity at 3sec is 2 m/s and at 0 sec is at 4m.s
time is 3-0
2-4/3-0, [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rashad764 said:
1. The problem statement, all variables and g iven/known data
View attachment 210424
find the acceleration at t=3 seconds

Homework Equations


vf-vi/tf-ti

The Attempt at a Solution


velocity at 3sec is 2 m/s and at 0 sec is at 4m.s
time is 3-0
2-4/3-0, [/B]

Your answer of ##2 - \frac{4}{3} - 0 = 0.66667## is incorrect. Even if you put in parentheses (which you should always do) you would get ##(2-4)/(3-0) = -0.66667##, which is still incorrect. Can you see where your error lies?
 
Ray Vickson said:
Your answer of ##2 - \frac{4}{3} - 0 = 0.66667## is incorrect. Even if you put in parentheses (which you should always do) you would get ##(2-4)/(3-0) = -0.66667##, which is still incorrect. Can you see where your error lies?
is it suppose to be -2?
 
rashad764 said:
is it suppose to be -2?
You tell me.
 
Ray Vickson said:
You tell me.
well since the line is going downwards, it has to be negative velocity
 
No the _velocity_ is still positive at t=3 sec. If you meant negative acceleration you would be correct.
 
i still can't see what's wrong
velocity at 3seconds is 2 and at 0 seconds its 4

time is 3 seconds minus 0
 
The problem is that in post #3 you just asked if the answer was -2m/s without showing your working. That's what Ray meant by you tell me.
 
rashad764 said:
velocity at 3seconds is 2 and at 0 seconds its 4

time is 3 seconds minus 0

The acceleration at t=3 is the slope of the line at t=3. Does the slope start at t=0?

or look at it this way...

The slope/acceleration is the same at t=2.5 and 3.5sec right. Does your method give the same answer?
 
  • #10
CWatters said:
The acceleration at t=3 is the slope of the line at t=3. Does the slope start at t=0?

or look at it this way...

The slope/acceleration is the same at t=2.5 and 3.5sec right. Does your method give the same answer?
CWatters said:
The problem is that in post #3 you just asked if the answer was -2m/s without showing your working. That's what Ray meant by you tell me.
i was saying if the the velocity was -2 so it would be -2-4/3

acceleration begins at t-2 and and ends at t=4
so it would be( 2-4)/(3-2)
 
  • #11
The velocity is never -2m/s. The velocity is positive at all times.

The _change_ in velocity is -2. Is that what you mean?

Sorry for editing this reply. (2-4)/(3-2) = -2 is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K